We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
META-ANALYSIS
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
REVIEW
The Effects of Nonpharmacologic Interventions on Cognitive Function in Patients With Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.
Oncology Nursing Forum 2016 September 2
PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION: To evaluate the effects of nonpharmacologic interventions on cognitive functioning in adult patients with cancer.
.
LITERATURE SEARCH: EMBASE, MEDLINE®, Cochrane Library CENTRAL, CINAHL®, and Korean databases. .
DATA EVALUATION: Cochrane's risk of bias for randomized studies and the RevMan, version 5.3, program of the Cochrane Library were used. .
SYNTHESIS: Fourteen controlled trials with a total of 977 participants met the inclusion criteria. Overall, nonpharmacologic interventions had beneficial effects on subjective cognitive functioning and memory, but not on attention, executive functioning, and verbal ability. In the subgroup analyses by approach type, psychological interventions had a significant effect on perceived cognitive function. .
CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that nonpharmacologic interventions, particularly psychological interventions, may have a positive impact on perceived cognitive functioning and memory in patients with cancer. Additional research with adequate power is required to determine the effectiveness of behavioral intervention as a cognitive rehabilitation strategy. .
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Cognitive function would be most improved in patients with cancer when a multimodal intervention approach (education, retraining, and physical activity) is employed.
LITERATURE SEARCH: EMBASE, MEDLINE®, Cochrane Library CENTRAL, CINAHL®, and Korean databases. .
DATA EVALUATION: Cochrane's risk of bias for randomized studies and the RevMan, version 5.3, program of the Cochrane Library were used. .
SYNTHESIS: Fourteen controlled trials with a total of 977 participants met the inclusion criteria. Overall, nonpharmacologic interventions had beneficial effects on subjective cognitive functioning and memory, but not on attention, executive functioning, and verbal ability. In the subgroup analyses by approach type, psychological interventions had a significant effect on perceived cognitive function. .
CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that nonpharmacologic interventions, particularly psychological interventions, may have a positive impact on perceived cognitive functioning and memory in patients with cancer. Additional research with adequate power is required to determine the effectiveness of behavioral intervention as a cognitive rehabilitation strategy. .
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Cognitive function would be most improved in patients with cancer when a multimodal intervention approach (education, retraining, and physical activity) is employed.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app