COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Decellularized extracellular matrix repair of volumetric muscle loss injury impairs adjacent bone healing in a rat model of complex musculoskeletal trauma.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic muscle loss (i.e., volumetric muscle loss [VML] injury) impairs adjacent fracture healing but is often left untreated. A promising therapy for this application is a decellularized extracellular matrix (ECM) because of their capacity to regenerate a vascularized tissue bed. This study tested the hypothesis that repair of VML concomitant to fracture with a small intestine submucosa (SIS)-ECM improves musculoskeletal healing.

METHODS: In male Lewis rats (~375 g), a 3-mm segmental bone defect (SBD) was created in concomitance with a 6-mm, full-thickness VML injury to the adjacent tibialis anterior (TA) muscle. For all rats (n = 10), the SBD was treated with internal plate fixation and delivery of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (1 μg) on a collagen sponge. The VML either had no repair or SIS-ECM repair (n = 5/group). Bone regeneration within the SBD (BV/TV [bone volume as a fraction of total volume]) was assessed via in vivo micro-computed tomography at 2, 4, and 6 weeks and histology at 6 weeks after injury. Tibialis anterior muscle in vivo strength and histologic assessments were performed at 6 weeks after injury.

RESULTS: Compared with no repair, SIS-ECM presented -21% (p = 0.09) and -27% (p = 0.004) BV/TV at 4 and 6 weeks after injury, respectively. At 6 weeks, the SBD gap length was shorter for the no repair than that for the SIS-ECM (2.64 ± 0.30 and 3.67 ± 0.41 mm, respectively; p = 0.09), whereas the distances from the end of each cortical segment to the center of the first stabilization screw were longer (1.86 ± 0.25 and 0.85 ± 0.30 mm, respectively; p = 0.035), indicating enhanced resorption in the SIS-ECM group. Both groups presented similar magnitude TA muscle strength deficits compared with their contralateral limbs (10-150 Hz: no repair, -58% to 67%; SIS-ECM, -51% to 74%). The TA muscle of the SIS-ECM group was remarkable for its presentation of fibrosis, edema, and immune cell presence.

CONCLUSIONS: Small intestine submucosa-ECM VML repair impaired open fracture healing and failed to improve skeletal muscle strength.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app