A Randomized Trial of Expanding Choice Sets to Motivate Advance Directive Completion.

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that advance directives may improve end-of-life care among seriously ill patients, but improving completion rates remains a challenge.

OBJECTIVE: This study tested the influence of increasing the number of options for completing an advance directive among seriously ill patients.

METHODOLOGY: Outpatients ( N = 316) receiving hemodialysis across 15 dialysis centers in the Philadelphia region between July 2014 and July 2015 were randomized to receive either the option to complete a brief advance directive form or expanded options including a brief, expanded, or comprehensive form. Patients in both groups could decline to complete an advance directive or take their selected version home. The primary outcome was a returned, completed advance directive. Secondary outcomes included whether patients wanted to complete an advance directive, decision satisfaction, quality of life at 3 months, and patient factors associated with advance directive completion.

RESULTS: Although offering more advance directive options was not significantly associated with increased rates of completion (13.1% in the standard group v. 12.2% in the expanded group, P = 0.80), it did significantly increase the proportion of patients who wanted to complete an advance directive and took one home (71.9% in standard v. 85.3% in expanded, P = 0.004). There was no difference in satisfaction ( P = 0.65) or change in quality of life between groups ( P = 0.63). A higher baseline quality of life was independently associated with advance directive completion ( P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These results suggest that although an expanded choice set may initially nudge patients toward completing advance directives without restricting choice, increasing actual completion requires additional interventions that overcome downstream barriers.