Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[OP.1A.10] CONVENTIONAL AND AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE AS PREDICTORS OF RETINAL ARTERIOLAR NARROWING.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate to what extent conventional (CBP) and daytime ambulatory (ABP) blood pressure predict narrowing of the retinal microvasculature.

DESIGN AND METHOD: In a population-based longitudinal study, 783 white Flemish participants (mean age, 38.2 years; 51.3% women) were randomly recruited, whose blood pressure was measured at baseline and follow-up and who underwent retinal photography at follow-up. CBP and ABP were averaged of five consecutive auscultatory readings and ambulatory oscillometric readings (10 AM-8 PM) programmed at 20 minute intervals. Systolic/diastolic HT thresholds were 140/90 mmHg for CBP and 135/85 mmHg for ABP. Central retinal arteriolar (CRAE) and venular (CRVE) equivalents and their ratio (AVR) were used as retinal traits post-processed by Vasculomatic ala Nicola software.

RESULTS: In multivariable-adjusted models including both CBP and ABP at baseline, CRAE changes after 10.3 years (median) were unrelated to CBP (P >  = 0.14), whereas ABP predicted CRAE narrowing (P <  = 0.01). Per 1-SD increment in systolic/diastolic blood pressure, the association sizes were -0.95 μm (95% confidence interval, -2.20 to 0.30)/ -0.75 μm (-1.93 to 0.42) for CBP and -1.76 μm (-2.95 to -0.58)/-1.48 μm (-2.61 to -0.34) for ABP. CRVE was not related to CBP or ABP, while associations of AVR with blood pressure mirrored those of CRAE, the numerator of the ratio. In multivariable-adjusted models with baseline ABP and follow-up CBP, CRAE decreased (P <  = 0.049) by -1.61/-1.04 μm and by -2.60/-2.40 μm in relation to baseline daytime and follow-up conventional systolic/diastolic blood pressures, respectively. Compared with normotension (normal CBP and ABP; prevalence, 77.6%), HT patients had smaller CRAE (147.5 vs. 152.7 μm; P < 0.001) and AVR (0.68 vs. 0.70; P = 0.001). CRAE and AVR were not different (P >  = 0.06) between normotension and white-coat HT (elevated CBP and normal ABP; 5.4%) and between masked HT (normal CBP and elevated ABP; 10.2%) and HT (elevated CBP and ABP; 6.8%).

CONCLUSIONS: The paradigm that retinal arterial narrowing precedes HT can be explained by the limitations of CBP measurement, including the nonidentification of masked HT.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app