We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Comparison of Clinical Results Following the Use of Drug-Eluting Balloons for a Bare-Metal Stent and Drug-Eluting Stent Instent Restenosis.
Journal of Interventional Cardiology 2016 October
BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) have emerged as a potential alternative to current treatments of instent restenosis (ISR). The study aims to investigate the clinical outcomes of a DEB angioplasty to treat bare-metal stent (BMS) ISR and drug-eluting stent (DES) ISR at 1-year clinical follow-up period.
METHODS: Between November 2011 and December 2014, 312 patients were diagnosed with coronary artery ISR at our hospital. A total of 426 coronary ISR lesions were treated with DEBs. The clinical outcomes, including target lesion revascularization (TLR), myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality were compared between the BMS-ISR group and DES-ISR group. Propensity score matched analysis was used to minimize bias.
RESULTS: The average age of the patients was 64.99 ± 10.35 years, and 76.9% of the patients were male. After multivariate Cox regression analyses about 1-year recurrent restenosis in DES-ISR group, only end stage renal disease (ESRD) (P = 0.047) and previous DEB failure (P < 0.001) were identified with significant difference. After propensity score matched analysis, the bias of baseline characteristics showed no significant difference. The DES-ISR group experienced more myocardial infarctions (2.8% vs 8.3%, P = 0.075), more TLR (8.1% vs 15.4%, P = 0.051), especially at nonostial lesion (5.7% vs 14.9%, P = 0.030) than the BMS-ISR group. Higher incidence of major cardiac cerebral adverse events happened in the DES-ISR group. (11.7% vs 22.1 %, P = 0.038) CONCLUSION: During the 1-year follow-up period, DEBs angioplasty for BMS-ISR had better clinical outcomes and less TLR than DES-ISR. ESRD and previous DEB failure were associated to TLR in DES-ISR group.
METHODS: Between November 2011 and December 2014, 312 patients were diagnosed with coronary artery ISR at our hospital. A total of 426 coronary ISR lesions were treated with DEBs. The clinical outcomes, including target lesion revascularization (TLR), myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality were compared between the BMS-ISR group and DES-ISR group. Propensity score matched analysis was used to minimize bias.
RESULTS: The average age of the patients was 64.99 ± 10.35 years, and 76.9% of the patients were male. After multivariate Cox regression analyses about 1-year recurrent restenosis in DES-ISR group, only end stage renal disease (ESRD) (P = 0.047) and previous DEB failure (P < 0.001) were identified with significant difference. After propensity score matched analysis, the bias of baseline characteristics showed no significant difference. The DES-ISR group experienced more myocardial infarctions (2.8% vs 8.3%, P = 0.075), more TLR (8.1% vs 15.4%, P = 0.051), especially at nonostial lesion (5.7% vs 14.9%, P = 0.030) than the BMS-ISR group. Higher incidence of major cardiac cerebral adverse events happened in the DES-ISR group. (11.7% vs 22.1 %, P = 0.038) CONCLUSION: During the 1-year follow-up period, DEBs angioplasty for BMS-ISR had better clinical outcomes and less TLR than DES-ISR. ESRD and previous DEB failure were associated to TLR in DES-ISR group.
Full text links
Trending Papers
Acute and non-acute decompensation of liver cirrhosis (47/130).Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver 2024 March 2
Guide to Utilization of the Microbiology Laboratory for Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases: 2024 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Society for Microbiology (ASM).Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 March 6
Ten Influential Point-of-Care Ultrasound Papers: 2023 in Review.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 Februrary 20
Administration of methylene blue in septic shock: pros and cons.Critical Care : the Official Journal of the Critical Care Forum 2024 Februrary 17
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app