Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Intermediate-term outcome of hemiarthroplasty for comminuted proximal humerus fractures.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of hemiarthroplasty for comminuted proximal humerus fractures and to verify the risk factors for functional and radiologic outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We treated 29 comminuted proximal humerus fractures by hemiarthroplasty with a low-profile prosthesis and a bone block graft, with an average follow-up period of 53.9 (24-119) months. The patients' mean age at surgery was 71.7 (52-85) years. We evaluated visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain and satisfaction, active range of motion, modified University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) score, and shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score. Radiographs were checked for stem position, loosening, and tuberosity union. The statistical evaluation was conducted to compare 2 demographics.

RESULTS: The mean VAS score was 2.1 (0-5) for pain and 8.0 (4-10) for satisfaction. Mean active forward flexion was 125° (90°-170°); external rotation, 42° (25°-70°); and internal rotation, at T11 (T7-L2). The mean modified UCLA score was 20 (12-30), and the mean QuickDASH score was 25 (12-38). All stems were stable without any loosening. All tuberosities were united except 2 tuberosity absorptions.

DISCUSSION: Patients older than 70 years and patients with chronic debilitating disease, >5-mm displacement of the prosthetic head from the glenoid, and a critical shoulder angle of >38° showed significantly poorer clinical outcome.

CONCLUSION: Low-profile hemiarthroplasty with bone block graft had unique advantages for tuberosity union. During surgery, good prosthetic positioning with respect to the anatomic axis of the glenoid and critical shoulder angle (>38°) were essential. However, age (>70 years) and systemic comorbidity showed poor clinical outcome. These factors should be considered in standardizing the clinical results.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app