Risk-adapted transplant strategies for high-risk Hodgkin lymphoma: are we there?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The treatment of high-risk classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) patients remains challenging, especially after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) failure. Moreover, the outcome of chemorefractory patients is still poor.

RECENT FINDINGS: The development of novel targeted therapies has changed the therapeutic options for high-risk patients. To improve outcome, treatment algorithms should integrate up-front, newly established prognostic markers. Tandem ASCT instead of single ASCT has been proposed as an option to improve outcome for high-risk patients. Availability of less toxic reduced intensity conditioning regimens and recent development in haploidentical transplantation have widened applicability and improved outcomes of allo-hematopoietic cell transplantation. Their exact role in cHL is still controversial and there is no consensus on the optimal transplantation strategy. In this context, results of tandem ASCT should also be compared with those of the autologous/reduced intensity conditioning-allo tandem approach. In this review, we discuss how transplantation strategies (auto and allo) can fit into the salvage treatment plan for patients with relapsed/refractory cHL, taking into account the new drugs available and integrating modern risk assessment.

SUMMARY: We speculated that improvements could be achieved by transplanting patients in earlier phases of their disease, if necessary after 'bridging' using the new drugs, and we propose an algorithm integrating the different treatment options.