Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Positive Pulmonary Computed Tomography Angiography in Patients with Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Clinical Prediction Rules, Thromboembolic Risk Factors, and Implications for Appropriate Use.

BACKGROUND: Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is associated with a variety of non-specific clinical manifestations. Using diagnostic algorithms that are based on internationally recognized guidelines, pulmonary computed tomography angiography (CTA) serves as the gold standard diagnostic imaging tool in PE. However; inappropriate use of pulmonary CTA may lead to unnecessary radiation exposure, contrast exposure, and cost. Based on our review of the literature, there is no existing data regarding prevalence and appropriate use of pulmonary CTA in suspected acute PE in Thailand.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of positive pulmonary CTA and evaluate appropriateness of use of pulmonary CTA, according to clinical prediction rules and recent guidelines.

MATERIAL AND METHOD: Three hundred consecutive patients admitted to the general medical ward at a large university-based tertiary referral center who were sent for pulmonary CTA due to suspected acute PE were included. Prevalence of positive pulmonary CTA for PE and other abnormalities were analyzed. Baseline clinical characteristics (including thromboembolic risk factors) and basic investigations (including chest X-ray, ECG, pulse oximetry, and D-dimer) were compared between patients with and without acute PE.

RESULTS: Acute PE was diagnosed by pulmonary CTA in 110 (36.7%) patients. According to Wells score and revised Geneva score, patients were categorized into low, moderate, and high probability, as follows: 63, 178, and 59 patients, respectively, and 44, 246, and 10 patients, respectively. Patients with high probability according to Wells score and revised Geneva score had higher rate of positive pulmonary CTA results, as compared to low and moderate probability (59.3%, 7.9%, and 39.3%, respectively, and 60%, 19.5%, and 38.2%, respectively). Predictors of positive CTA were sign of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (OR: 2.6, 95% CI: 1.497-4.514; p<0.001), S1Q3T3 (OR: 4.211, 95% CI: 2.242-7.908; p<0.001), and enlarged right pulmonary artery (OR: 2.439, 95% CI: 1.475-4.035; p<0.001). Using multivariate analysis, all three parameters remained independent factors. In the Wells score low probability group, 31 of 63 patients were not tested for D-dimer prior to pulmonary CTA, with only one patient in that group being diagnosed with acute PE.

CONCLUSION: This was the first study to investigate prevalence of positive pulmonary CTA for acute PE in a large university-based tertiary referral hospital in Thailand Prevalence of positive test for PE by pulmonary CTA in patients with suspected acute PE was approximately 33%. Sign of DVT S1Q3T3 pattern, and enlarged right pulmonary artery were significant clinical predictors of positive pulmonary CTA. Positive pulmonary CTA result was much less likely in patients with low probability, especially in the absence of thromboembolic risk factors and positive D-dimer This study emphasized the importance and value of accurate and effective triage in reducing both patient care costs and patient radiation exposure.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app