We have located links that may give you full text access.
Digital subtraction angiography-guided esophagography, intraluminal drainage, and endoscopic clipping-complex managements for intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomotic leak.
Journal of Surgical Research 2016 July
BACKGROUND: Intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomotic leak is a critical complication after esophagectomy. Recently, novel complex diagnostic and therapeutic managements for intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomotic leak have been performed at our institution.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-seven consecutive patients with intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomotic leak after esophagectomy from January 2009 to May 2015 at our institution were reviewed. Thirty-nine patients received conventional managements (conventional group), in which they were diagnosed via contrast swallow when there was a suspicion of anastomotic leak and were subsequently treated with a metallic stent. Twenty-eight patients received complex managements (complex group), in which they were diagnosed using digital subtraction angiography, an intraluminal drainage tube was placed, and clips were subsequently performed under an endoscope. The outcomes of the two groups were retrospectively analyzed.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) between the two groups in the preoperative general clinical data, whereas the postoperative data exhibited some differences. Compared with the conventional group, the confirmation time and recovery time are significantly decreased in the complex group (P < 0.01 and P < 0.01, respectively), and the incidence of severe complications is also lower (P < 0.01); however, there were no significant differences in the mortality rate between the two groups (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Complex managements may represent a useful therapeutic option for postoperative esophagogastric anastomotic leak.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-seven consecutive patients with intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomotic leak after esophagectomy from January 2009 to May 2015 at our institution were reviewed. Thirty-nine patients received conventional managements (conventional group), in which they were diagnosed via contrast swallow when there was a suspicion of anastomotic leak and were subsequently treated with a metallic stent. Twenty-eight patients received complex managements (complex group), in which they were diagnosed using digital subtraction angiography, an intraluminal drainage tube was placed, and clips were subsequently performed under an endoscope. The outcomes of the two groups were retrospectively analyzed.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) between the two groups in the preoperative general clinical data, whereas the postoperative data exhibited some differences. Compared with the conventional group, the confirmation time and recovery time are significantly decreased in the complex group (P < 0.01 and P < 0.01, respectively), and the incidence of severe complications is also lower (P < 0.01); however, there were no significant differences in the mortality rate between the two groups (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Complex managements may represent a useful therapeutic option for postoperative esophagogastric anastomotic leak.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app