We have located links that may give you full text access.
The impact of a focused vascular lower limb arterial duplex (F-VLAD) scan in management decisions for acute limb ischaemia.
Perfusion 2017 January
OBJECTIVE: To establish the diagnostic accuracy of a 'focused vascular lower limb arterial duplex scan (F-VLAD)' developed to facilitate rapid decision-making for acute limb ischaemia (ALI).
METHODS: Ten cases of ALI were identified from our patient database; clinical details, history and examination findings were extracted from the clinical notes. Original 'full' duplex ultrasound (DUS) pictorial reports were 're-formatted' to include only anatomical segments included in the 'F-VLAD' scan. The series of 10 reports were emailed to 1741 vascular surgeons. Each recipient received a random mixture of full and F-VLAD scans. Participants were asked regarding next step in management and confidence in decision-making (Likert scale; 1 strongly disagree, 5 strongly agree). The cases were again sent out to the same database and respondents were asked as to the cause of ischaemia (embolic or thrombosis).
RESULTS: Eighty-one participants responded to the first survey and 43 participants to the second survey. Participants felt more confident making decisions regarding management using the full duplex report compared to the F-VLAD report (4 (3-4) vs 3 (2-4), median (IQR); p<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy (differentiating embolus from thrombosis) when comparing the F-VLAD and full DUS reports (85.4% vs 88.3%; p=0.461). F-VLAD and 'full' DUS reports had comparable sensitivity (85.1% vs 86.8%), specificity (85.6% vs 89.2%),positive predictive value (PPV) (80.4% vs 81.9%) and negative predictive value (NPV) (89.2% vs 92.2%), respectively.
CONCLUSION: The F-VLAD scan has comparable accuracy to a traditional full DUS in diagnosing the underlying aetiology of ALI. This may facilitate surgeon-performed point-of-care DUS.
METHODS: Ten cases of ALI were identified from our patient database; clinical details, history and examination findings were extracted from the clinical notes. Original 'full' duplex ultrasound (DUS) pictorial reports were 're-formatted' to include only anatomical segments included in the 'F-VLAD' scan. The series of 10 reports were emailed to 1741 vascular surgeons. Each recipient received a random mixture of full and F-VLAD scans. Participants were asked regarding next step in management and confidence in decision-making (Likert scale; 1 strongly disagree, 5 strongly agree). The cases were again sent out to the same database and respondents were asked as to the cause of ischaemia (embolic or thrombosis).
RESULTS: Eighty-one participants responded to the first survey and 43 participants to the second survey. Participants felt more confident making decisions regarding management using the full duplex report compared to the F-VLAD report (4 (3-4) vs 3 (2-4), median (IQR); p<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy (differentiating embolus from thrombosis) when comparing the F-VLAD and full DUS reports (85.4% vs 88.3%; p=0.461). F-VLAD and 'full' DUS reports had comparable sensitivity (85.1% vs 86.8%), specificity (85.6% vs 89.2%),positive predictive value (PPV) (80.4% vs 81.9%) and negative predictive value (NPV) (89.2% vs 92.2%), respectively.
CONCLUSION: The F-VLAD scan has comparable accuracy to a traditional full DUS in diagnosing the underlying aetiology of ALI. This may facilitate surgeon-performed point-of-care DUS.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app