We have located links that may give you full text access.
Temporal changes in physiological parameters of systemic inflammatory response syndrome during the three days prior to a diagnosis of sepsis: a case-control study.
Journal of Clinical Nursing 2016 November
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to determine temporal patterns of early changes in physiological parameters of systemic inflammatory response syndrome over three days prior to a diagnosis of sepsis.
BACKGROUND: Early detection and timely management of systemic inflammatory response syndrome are often not implemented due to a failure to recognise or diagnose systemic inflammatory response syndrome.
DESIGN: A retrospective case-control study design was adopted.
METHODS: All 81 study subjects in an intensive care unit were included: 33 case subjects who received a definitive diagnosis of sepsis and 48 control patients who were not diagnosed with systemic inflammatory response syndrome or sepsis. Vital signs (temperatures, heart rates, blood pressures and respiratory rates) and white blood cell count, urine output, serum creatinine concentration, platelet count and serum glucose level data were collected for one, two and three days prior to sepsis diagnosis.
RESULTS: Homogeneity test revealed greater proportions of the aged and subjects with diabetes mellitus, hypertension and wound in the case group. Analysis also showed significant intergroup differences in systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria score, heart rates, platelet counts and blood glucose levels, but no intergroup differences in body temperatures, blood pressures, respiratory rates, urine outputs or serum creatinine levels. A larger proportion of case subjects were fitted with a central venous or Foley catheter.
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a wound, hypertension or diabetes mellitus, and the use of an invasive medical device may increase the risk of systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Of the physiological parameters examined, heart rate, platelet counts, and blood glucose levels might serve as significant early signs of systemic inflammatory response syndrome.
RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Caution should be observed whenever diabetic or hypertension patients develop sudden and persistent hyperglycaemia or tachycardia, and nurses should also be aware of the potential for systemic inflammatory response syndrome in patients with a central venous or indwelling urinary catheter.
BACKGROUND: Early detection and timely management of systemic inflammatory response syndrome are often not implemented due to a failure to recognise or diagnose systemic inflammatory response syndrome.
DESIGN: A retrospective case-control study design was adopted.
METHODS: All 81 study subjects in an intensive care unit were included: 33 case subjects who received a definitive diagnosis of sepsis and 48 control patients who were not diagnosed with systemic inflammatory response syndrome or sepsis. Vital signs (temperatures, heart rates, blood pressures and respiratory rates) and white blood cell count, urine output, serum creatinine concentration, platelet count and serum glucose level data were collected for one, two and three days prior to sepsis diagnosis.
RESULTS: Homogeneity test revealed greater proportions of the aged and subjects with diabetes mellitus, hypertension and wound in the case group. Analysis also showed significant intergroup differences in systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria score, heart rates, platelet counts and blood glucose levels, but no intergroup differences in body temperatures, blood pressures, respiratory rates, urine outputs or serum creatinine levels. A larger proportion of case subjects were fitted with a central venous or Foley catheter.
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a wound, hypertension or diabetes mellitus, and the use of an invasive medical device may increase the risk of systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Of the physiological parameters examined, heart rate, platelet counts, and blood glucose levels might serve as significant early signs of systemic inflammatory response syndrome.
RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Caution should be observed whenever diabetic or hypertension patients develop sudden and persistent hyperglycaemia or tachycardia, and nurses should also be aware of the potential for systemic inflammatory response syndrome in patients with a central venous or indwelling urinary catheter.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app