Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Prosthetic Graft Patency in the Setting of a Polymicrobial Infection in Swine (Sus scrofa).

BACKGROUND: In the setting of vascular injury, vein interposition graft is the preferred conduit, but may have limited availability. This study seeks to develop a large animal model assessing the graft performance of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and Dacron in the setting of a polymicrobial infection.

METHODS: Thirty-seven animals were placed into 4 groups for a 21-day survival period. Six-millimeter PTFE or Dacron interposition grafts were placed in the right iliac artery with a standardized bacterial inoculation. Native vessel with and without contamination served as control groups. The inoculant was 1 × 10(7) of genetically labeled Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. The primary end points were graft patency (determined by duplex ultrasound and necropsy) and graft infection (culture with molecular analysis). Secondary end points included physiological measurements, blood cultures, laboratory data, and histopathology.

RESULTS: PTFE and Dacron had similar infection rates of 85.7% and 75%, respectively. There was no significant difference in infectious organisms between graft materials. PTFE and Dacron exhibited bacterial ingrowth and transmigration to the intraluminal portion of the conduit. Forty-five percent of the Dacron group and 40% of the PTFE group remained patent at postoperative day 21 (P = 0.98). Clinical data, including white blood cell count, percent neutrophils, and lactate, did not vary significantly between groups.

CONCLUSIONS: PTFE and Dacron perform similarly in terms of infection rates and graft failure as both have a propensity toward bacterial ingrowth and occlusion when compared with controls. This is a valid animal model to assess graft performance in the setting of polymicrobial infection and provides an avenue for studying novel prosthetic conduits.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app