We have located links that may give you full text access.
Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Area Measurements by Planimetry Using Two-Dimensional Simultaneous Orthogonal Plane Imaging During Transesophageal Echocardiography.
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 2016 October
OBJECTIVE: Calculations of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) area are typically based on the assumption that the LVOT is circular. This study was conducted to determine whether simultaneous orthogonal plane imaging with tilt during two-dimensional (2D) transesophageal echocardiography provided more accurate measurements of the LVOT area than the standard method.
DESIGN: The authors prospectively measured the LVOT area in 2D by (1) the standard calculation based on the diameter as viewed on the long axis, and (2) a direct measurement using planimetry of the short axis, in consecutive patients presenting for elective surgery. The authors validated the planimetric technique by obtaining three-dimensional (3D) measurements in a subset of the subjects.
SETTING: An academic medical center.
PARTICIPANTS: Adult surgical patients with no evidence of aortic stenosis.
INTERVENTIONS: Transesophageal images were acquired by anesthesiologists certified by the National Board of Echocardiography.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Image acquisition and assessment were performed in the operating room and found to be adequate for analysis in 52 of 55 subjects. Simultaneous orthogonal plane imaging with tilt enabled long- and short-axis visualization of the LVOT. The authors found that the standard method underestimated the area by 0.78 cm(2) compared to the direct method (2D planimetry) when measured at the same beat at a similar point in the cardiac cycle. Moreover, 2D planimetry measurements were comparable to 3D planimetry measurements in the last 20 study subjects (R(2) = 0.88, p<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that 2D planimetry may be more accurate than 2D diameter-based calculations.
DESIGN: The authors prospectively measured the LVOT area in 2D by (1) the standard calculation based on the diameter as viewed on the long axis, and (2) a direct measurement using planimetry of the short axis, in consecutive patients presenting for elective surgery. The authors validated the planimetric technique by obtaining three-dimensional (3D) measurements in a subset of the subjects.
SETTING: An academic medical center.
PARTICIPANTS: Adult surgical patients with no evidence of aortic stenosis.
INTERVENTIONS: Transesophageal images were acquired by anesthesiologists certified by the National Board of Echocardiography.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Image acquisition and assessment were performed in the operating room and found to be adequate for analysis in 52 of 55 subjects. Simultaneous orthogonal plane imaging with tilt enabled long- and short-axis visualization of the LVOT. The authors found that the standard method underestimated the area by 0.78 cm(2) compared to the direct method (2D planimetry) when measured at the same beat at a similar point in the cardiac cycle. Moreover, 2D planimetry measurements were comparable to 3D planimetry measurements in the last 20 study subjects (R(2) = 0.88, p<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that 2D planimetry may be more accurate than 2D diameter-based calculations.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app