We have located links that may give you full text access.
The relationship between facial bone wall defects and dimensional alterations of the ridge following flapless tooth extraction in the anterior maxilla.
Clinical Oral Implants Research 2017 August
PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between defects of the facial socket wall at extraction and dimensional changes 8 weeks later in maxillary central and lateral incisor sockets.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 34 consecutive patients requiring single tooth implants in the anterior maxilla (27 central and 7 lateral incisors) were evaluated. Orofacial external ridge, bone dimensions and the location of the socket bone crest were measured at extraction and again 8.5 ± 2.91 weeks later. The status of the facial bone wall was recorded at the same time points.
RESULTS: At extraction, 16 of 34 sites (47%) had intact facial bone. There were fenestration defects at 9 of 34 sites (26.5%) and dehiscence defects at 9 of 34 sites (26.5%). A significant reduction (P < 0.001) in the external orofacial ridge dimension occurred (mesial 1.4 ± 1.30 mm or 12.1%, facial 2.5 ± 1.46 mm or 22.2%, distal 1.1 ± 0.83 mm or 10.5%), with greatest change at dehiscence (3.3 ± 1.80 mm or 28.4%) and fenestration sites (2.8 ± 1.40 mm or 24.9%). A significant reduction in orofacial bone dimension occurred (mesial 0.8 ± 0.80 mm or 9.3%, P < 0.001; facial 1.2 ± 1.03 mm or 18.3%, P < 0.001; distal 0.4 ± 0.65 mm or 5.5%, P < 0.01). Vertical resorption of the bone crest was most marked at the mid-facial aspect (1.4 ± 1.94 mm, P < 0.001). Initial fenestration defect sites demonstrated the greatest vertical dimensional change (2.9 ± 2.67 mm; P = 0.008). Of 16 sites with initially intact facial bone, 9 sites (56.3%) developed dehiscence defects after 8 weeks. Of the 9 initial sites with fenestration defects, 5 (55.6%) turned into dehiscence defects. All 9 sites with initial dehiscence defects healed with persistence of the dehiscence.
CONCLUSIONS: Eight weeks after flapless extraction of maxillary central and lateral incisors, a reduction in the orofacial dimensions of the ridge was observed due to resorption of the facial bone of the socket. Tooth type (maxillary central incisor) and thin tissue phenotype significantly influenced the outcomes. The dimensional alterations were most pronounced at sites that initially had fenestration and dehiscence defects of the facial bone.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 34 consecutive patients requiring single tooth implants in the anterior maxilla (27 central and 7 lateral incisors) were evaluated. Orofacial external ridge, bone dimensions and the location of the socket bone crest were measured at extraction and again 8.5 ± 2.91 weeks later. The status of the facial bone wall was recorded at the same time points.
RESULTS: At extraction, 16 of 34 sites (47%) had intact facial bone. There were fenestration defects at 9 of 34 sites (26.5%) and dehiscence defects at 9 of 34 sites (26.5%). A significant reduction (P < 0.001) in the external orofacial ridge dimension occurred (mesial 1.4 ± 1.30 mm or 12.1%, facial 2.5 ± 1.46 mm or 22.2%, distal 1.1 ± 0.83 mm or 10.5%), with greatest change at dehiscence (3.3 ± 1.80 mm or 28.4%) and fenestration sites (2.8 ± 1.40 mm or 24.9%). A significant reduction in orofacial bone dimension occurred (mesial 0.8 ± 0.80 mm or 9.3%, P < 0.001; facial 1.2 ± 1.03 mm or 18.3%, P < 0.001; distal 0.4 ± 0.65 mm or 5.5%, P < 0.01). Vertical resorption of the bone crest was most marked at the mid-facial aspect (1.4 ± 1.94 mm, P < 0.001). Initial fenestration defect sites demonstrated the greatest vertical dimensional change (2.9 ± 2.67 mm; P = 0.008). Of 16 sites with initially intact facial bone, 9 sites (56.3%) developed dehiscence defects after 8 weeks. Of the 9 initial sites with fenestration defects, 5 (55.6%) turned into dehiscence defects. All 9 sites with initial dehiscence defects healed with persistence of the dehiscence.
CONCLUSIONS: Eight weeks after flapless extraction of maxillary central and lateral incisors, a reduction in the orofacial dimensions of the ridge was observed due to resorption of the facial bone of the socket. Tooth type (maxillary central incisor) and thin tissue phenotype significantly influenced the outcomes. The dimensional alterations were most pronounced at sites that initially had fenestration and dehiscence defects of the facial bone.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app