We have located links that may give you full text access.
Beneficial effects of rapid introduction of adaptive servo-ventilation in the emergency room in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema.
Journal of Cardiology 2017 January
BACKGROUND: Adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) at home has been used for patients with chronic heart failure. However, its effect on acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (ACPE) is not clear. The aim of this study was to elucidate the effect of ASV use in the emergency room in patients with ACPE.
METHODS: We enrolled 198 consecutive patients with ACPE. Eighty patients received standard therapies, such as oxygen inhalation and vasodilators (conventional therapy group), and 118 received ASV in addition to standard therapy (ASV therapy group). ASV was initiated in the emergency room immediately after diagnosis. The procedure was switched over from ASV to endotracheal intubation (ETI) when oxygenation was insufficient.
RESULTS: The ETI rate in the ASV therapy group was significantly lower than that in the conventional therapy group (3% vs. 21%, p<0.01). The intensive care unit and/or high care unit length of stay in the ASV therapy group was also significantly shorter than that in the conventional therapy group (1.9±2.1 days vs. 5.3±6.8 days, p<0.01). Consequently, the hospitalization period in the ASV therapy group was shorter than that in the conventional therapy group (19.3±11.0 days vs. 26.3±16.6 days, p<0.01).
CONCLUSION: In patients with ACPE, rapid introduction of ASV in the emergency room reduces the need for ETI and decreases the hospitalization period.
METHODS: We enrolled 198 consecutive patients with ACPE. Eighty patients received standard therapies, such as oxygen inhalation and vasodilators (conventional therapy group), and 118 received ASV in addition to standard therapy (ASV therapy group). ASV was initiated in the emergency room immediately after diagnosis. The procedure was switched over from ASV to endotracheal intubation (ETI) when oxygenation was insufficient.
RESULTS: The ETI rate in the ASV therapy group was significantly lower than that in the conventional therapy group (3% vs. 21%, p<0.01). The intensive care unit and/or high care unit length of stay in the ASV therapy group was also significantly shorter than that in the conventional therapy group (1.9±2.1 days vs. 5.3±6.8 days, p<0.01). Consequently, the hospitalization period in the ASV therapy group was shorter than that in the conventional therapy group (19.3±11.0 days vs. 26.3±16.6 days, p<0.01).
CONCLUSION: In patients with ACPE, rapid introduction of ASV in the emergency room reduces the need for ETI and decreases the hospitalization period.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app