Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Does the Prevalence of Spondylolysis and Spina Bifida Occulta Observed in Pediatric Patients Remain Stable in Adults?

STUDY DESIGN: Cross sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the prevalence of lumbar spondylolysis and spina bifida occulta (SBO) in pediatric and adult populations.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The prevalence of spondylolysis reported from radiograph-based studies in children had been questioned in Computed Tomography (CT)-based studies in adults; however, a recent CT-based study in pediatric patients has confirmed the previously reported data in pediatric populations. SBO, which has been associated with spondylolysis, has demonstrated a decreasing prevalence with increasing age during childhood and adolescence. No studies have compared the prevalence of spondylolysis and SBO in pediatric and adult patients using CT as a screening method.

METHODS: We studied 228 pediatric patients (4 to 15 y old) and 235 adults (30 to 45 y old) who underwent abdominal and pelvic CT scans for reasons not related to the spine. The entire lumbo-sacral spine was evaluated to detect the presence of spondylolysis and SBO. We compared the prevalence of spondylolysis and SBO in pediatric patients and adults.

RESULTS: The prevalence of spondylolysis in pediatric patients was 3.5% (1.1 - 5.9%), and in adults, it was 3.8% (1.7 - 6.8%), P=1. The prevalence of SBO in pediatric subjects was 41.2% (34.8 - 59.2%) and dropped to 7.7%, (4.3 - 11.5%) in adults, P<0.01. The male prevalence of SBO in pediatric patients was 51.4%, while it was 32.2% in females (P<0.01); this gender difference was not significant in the adult population (P=0.8).

CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of lumbar spondylolysis remained constant from pediatric age through adulthood. The prevalence of SBO decreased from 41.2% in children to 7.7% in adults; this finding suggests that closure of the vertebral arch may not be completed in early childhood in a large percentage of subjects.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app