We have located links that may give you full text access.
Antimicrobial stewardship using pharmacy data for the nurse-led school-based clinics in Counties Manukau District Health Board for management of group A streptococcal pharyngitis and skin infection.
New Zealand Medical Journal 2016 May 28
AIM: To evaluate antimicrobial usage in the school-based clinics against operating guidelines.
METHOD: Antimicrobial prescribing data (2014) from 10/18 participating pharmacies serving 14,153/23,588 primary school children of the programme were accessible. Prescriptions from 5/10 pharmacies were available for identifying type, amount, and indication of the medicine. One pharmacy serving a defined population (n=3,513) with single healthcare provider delivering the school programme was selected for detailed evaluation and identifying individuals receiving multiple treatments.
RESULTS: Data from 10 pharmacies (n=7,889 prescriptions) showed 91.2% of prescriptions were for group A streptococcal-positive throat swab, 8.8% for skin infections. More detail from 5/10 pharmacies showed only 2% of group A streptococcal pharyngitis treatments (107/4,672) were not first-line (56 cephalexin and 51 rifampin prescriptions). Fusidic acid (159/452, 35.18%) or cephalexin (169/452, 37.39%) were most commonly used for skin infection. Analysis in the defined population showed <4% (151/4,325) of assessed skin conditions received antimicrobials, and only 6 individuals received more than one course of oral antimicrobial over the year.
CONCLUSION: Antimicrobial administration demonstrates high compliance with the protocol. There was very limited use of second-line antimicrobials for recurrent pharyngitis. Most skin infections did not require antimicrobial treatment. Repeated antimicrobials for individuals were rare.
METHOD: Antimicrobial prescribing data (2014) from 10/18 participating pharmacies serving 14,153/23,588 primary school children of the programme were accessible. Prescriptions from 5/10 pharmacies were available for identifying type, amount, and indication of the medicine. One pharmacy serving a defined population (n=3,513) with single healthcare provider delivering the school programme was selected for detailed evaluation and identifying individuals receiving multiple treatments.
RESULTS: Data from 10 pharmacies (n=7,889 prescriptions) showed 91.2% of prescriptions were for group A streptococcal-positive throat swab, 8.8% for skin infections. More detail from 5/10 pharmacies showed only 2% of group A streptococcal pharyngitis treatments (107/4,672) were not first-line (56 cephalexin and 51 rifampin prescriptions). Fusidic acid (159/452, 35.18%) or cephalexin (169/452, 37.39%) were most commonly used for skin infection. Analysis in the defined population showed <4% (151/4,325) of assessed skin conditions received antimicrobials, and only 6 individuals received more than one course of oral antimicrobial over the year.
CONCLUSION: Antimicrobial administration demonstrates high compliance with the protocol. There was very limited use of second-line antimicrobials for recurrent pharyngitis. Most skin infections did not require antimicrobial treatment. Repeated antimicrobials for individuals were rare.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app