Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Distinguishing liver haemangiomas from metastatic tumours using gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced diffusion-weighted imaging at 1.5T MRI.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study to evaluate the effectiveness of enhanced diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for distinguishing liver haemangiomas from metastatic tumours (mets).

METHODS: This study included 23 patients with 27 haemangiomas and 26 patients with 46 mets. Breath-holding diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) (b-values of 0, 50, 100, 150, 200, 400 and 800 s/mm2 ) were obtained before and 20 min after injection of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA). Lesion contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were calculated. The data were processed using the bi-exponential model of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to compare the diagnostic performance when distinguishing haemangioma from mets.

RESULTS: The CNRs of haemangioma and mets at post-contrast enhancement increased. All IVIM parameters for liver haemangioma and mets showed no significant differences between pre- and post-contrast enhancement. The highest Az value of CNR and IVIM parameters occurred at a post-contrast b-value of 0 s/mm2 and true diffusion (D). The highest qualitative evaluation occurred at a b-value of 800 s/mm2 . The sensitivity and specificity, with a CNR of 100 or higher at a post-contrast b-value of 0 s/mm2 and considered to be haemangioma, were 89% and 67% (<10 mm, 91%, 77%) respectively. The sensitivity and specificity, when D was higher than 1.4 × 10-3 mm2 /s, were 74% and 83% (<10 mm, 64%, 77%) respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of qualitative evaluation by enhanced DWI were 74% and 76% (<10 mm, 64%, 80%) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of the CNR was highest with b = 0; however, examination at high b-values had advantages in the qualitative evaluation of some small-size lesions.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app