We have located links that may give you full text access.
Is there a relationship between talar osteochondral lesions and foot angles?
La Radiologia Medica 2016 October
PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the relationship between talar osteochondral defects (OCDs) and foot angles in this study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study that included 25 patients with talar OCD and 29 patients without OCD who underwent magnetic resonance imaging in our department between September 2013 and January 2015. We retrospectively measured the foot angles (Bohler's angle, lateral talocalcaneal angle and calcaneal inclination angle) on ankle radiographs in both groups.
RESULTS: Bohler's angle showed no significant differences between the patients (range 20.50°-48.10°, mean 33.40° ± 6.09°) and the control group (range18.80°-42.40°, mean 31.95° ± 4.21°) (p = 0.397). Calcaneal inclination angle showed no significant differences between the patients (range 3°-29.2°, mean 20.55° ± 6.73°) and the control group (range 10.20°-29.80° mean 20.47° ± 4.21°) (p = 0.956). However, talocalcaneal angle was significantly higher in the patients (range 27.80°-44.80°, median 39.50° ± 6.18°) compared with the control group (range 22.60°-40.50°, median 34.10° ± 4.26°) (p = 0.032).
CONCLUSION: There is an association between lateral talocalcaneal angle and non-traumatic talar OCD.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study that included 25 patients with talar OCD and 29 patients without OCD who underwent magnetic resonance imaging in our department between September 2013 and January 2015. We retrospectively measured the foot angles (Bohler's angle, lateral talocalcaneal angle and calcaneal inclination angle) on ankle radiographs in both groups.
RESULTS: Bohler's angle showed no significant differences between the patients (range 20.50°-48.10°, mean 33.40° ± 6.09°) and the control group (range18.80°-42.40°, mean 31.95° ± 4.21°) (p = 0.397). Calcaneal inclination angle showed no significant differences between the patients (range 3°-29.2°, mean 20.55° ± 6.73°) and the control group (range 10.20°-29.80° mean 20.47° ± 4.21°) (p = 0.956). However, talocalcaneal angle was significantly higher in the patients (range 27.80°-44.80°, median 39.50° ± 6.18°) compared with the control group (range 22.60°-40.50°, median 34.10° ± 4.26°) (p = 0.032).
CONCLUSION: There is an association between lateral talocalcaneal angle and non-traumatic talar OCD.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app