We have located links that may give you full text access.
English Abstract
Journal Article
[SERODIAGNOSIS OF THE MYCOBACTERIUM AVIUM COMPLEX BY USING IgA ANTIBODIES FOR THE GLYCOPEPTIDOLIPID CORE ANTIGEN].
Kekkaku : [Tuberculosis] 2016 Februrary
PURPOSE: The diagnosis of Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease (MAC-PD) can be challenging. A serodiagnosis enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kit, which detects the serum anti-glycopeptidolipid (GPL) core IgA antibody, has been commercialized recently; however, its clinical usefulness in the diagnosis of MAC-PD is still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the availability of this kit and identify factors affecting testing accuracy.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 195 patients who were evaluated with an EIA kit at Nagasaki University Hospital between November 2012 and March 2014.
RESULTS: 12 of 16 (75.0%) MAC patients have underlying diseases ; 8 of 16 (50%) had complications associated with respiratory diseases. There were no significant differences between the seropositive and seronegative background of patients with confirmed MAC-PD. Regarding the accuracy of serodiagnosis EIA kit, its sensitivity and specificity were 81.3% and 88.3% (with a cut-off value of 0.7 U/ml), respectively. Of false-positive patients with bronchiectasis, 28.6 % demonstrated a good response to anti-MAC treatment, indicating that the sensitivity of the EIA kit might be higher than that of culture-based diagnosis because patients with clinically diagnosed MAC-PD were included in the false-positive population.
CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, the serodiagnosis EIA kit demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of MAC-PD. Further clinical investigations are necessary to clarify the role of this kit in definitively diagnosing MAC infections.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 195 patients who were evaluated with an EIA kit at Nagasaki University Hospital between November 2012 and March 2014.
RESULTS: 12 of 16 (75.0%) MAC patients have underlying diseases ; 8 of 16 (50%) had complications associated with respiratory diseases. There were no significant differences between the seropositive and seronegative background of patients with confirmed MAC-PD. Regarding the accuracy of serodiagnosis EIA kit, its sensitivity and specificity were 81.3% and 88.3% (with a cut-off value of 0.7 U/ml), respectively. Of false-positive patients with bronchiectasis, 28.6 % demonstrated a good response to anti-MAC treatment, indicating that the sensitivity of the EIA kit might be higher than that of culture-based diagnosis because patients with clinically diagnosed MAC-PD were included in the false-positive population.
CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, the serodiagnosis EIA kit demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of MAC-PD. Further clinical investigations are necessary to clarify the role of this kit in definitively diagnosing MAC infections.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app