We have located links that may give you full text access.
Pulsed Electro Magnetic Fields for Postsurgical Pain Management in Women Undergoing Caesarian Section, a Double-blind Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial.
Clinical Journal of Pain 2016 March 26
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of PEMF in relation to reducing postoperative pain, analgesics use and wound healing in patients undergoing Caesarian Section (C-Section).
METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated 72 women who underwent elective C-Section. 36 patients were assigned in active-PEMF and 36 in sham-PEMF groups. The participants were asked to report their pain intensity based on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 hours and two, four and seven days after surgery. The amount of used analgesics was recorded. The surgical site was evaluated to assess the wound healing process on the seventh postoperative day.
RESULTS: The postoperative pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores were significantly lower in the active-PEMF group in all the measured periods within early and late postoperative periods. Fewer women in the active-PEMF group experienced severe postoperative pain within 24 hours postoperative (36% vs. 72%, P=0.002). Analgesic use during the first 24 hours after C-section was 1.9 folds lower in the active-PEMF group (1.6±0.7 vs. 3.1±1.2, P<0.001). Total analgesic use during seven postoperative days was 2.1 folds lower in the active PEMF group than in the sham group (1.7±0.7 vs. 3.7±1.1, P<0.001). Seven days postoperatively, patients in the active-PEMF group had better wound healing with no exudate, erythema or edema (P=0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: PEMF treatment after C-section significantly decreases postsurgical pain, analgesic use and surgical wound exudate and edema, and is associated with high level of patient satisfaction.
TRIAL REGISTRY: https://www.irct.ir (IRCT2014070711020N3).
METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated 72 women who underwent elective C-Section. 36 patients were assigned in active-PEMF and 36 in sham-PEMF groups. The participants were asked to report their pain intensity based on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 hours and two, four and seven days after surgery. The amount of used analgesics was recorded. The surgical site was evaluated to assess the wound healing process on the seventh postoperative day.
RESULTS: The postoperative pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores were significantly lower in the active-PEMF group in all the measured periods within early and late postoperative periods. Fewer women in the active-PEMF group experienced severe postoperative pain within 24 hours postoperative (36% vs. 72%, P=0.002). Analgesic use during the first 24 hours after C-section was 1.9 folds lower in the active-PEMF group (1.6±0.7 vs. 3.1±1.2, P<0.001). Total analgesic use during seven postoperative days was 2.1 folds lower in the active PEMF group than in the sham group (1.7±0.7 vs. 3.7±1.1, P<0.001). Seven days postoperatively, patients in the active-PEMF group had better wound healing with no exudate, erythema or edema (P=0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: PEMF treatment after C-section significantly decreases postsurgical pain, analgesic use and surgical wound exudate and edema, and is associated with high level of patient satisfaction.
TRIAL REGISTRY: https://www.irct.ir (IRCT2014070711020N3).
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app