We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanics After Excimer Laser Corneal Refractive Surgery in High Myopic Patients Using Dynamic Scheimpflug Technology.
Eye & Contact Lens 2017 November
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of femtosecond-assisted thin flap laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy with mitomycin-C (PRK-MMC) in highly myopic patients (>7.0 D [D]) on corneal biomechanical parameters.
METHODS: In this prospective comparative interventional case series, 60 patients (30 patients in each group) with a manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) greater than 7.0 D were enrolled. Corvis ST parameters were measured before and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Preoperatively, mean MRSE was -8.65±1.51 D in FS-LASIK and -8.04±1.70 D in PRK-MMC groups (P=0.149), and corneal thickness was 570.67±36.79 μm and 507.12±32.55 μm, respectively (P<0.001). At 6 months, both groups showed significantly higher applanation (A) 2 time and A2-velocity (P<0.05 in both), whereas intraocular pressure (IOP), corrected IOP, A1 time, A1-velocity, and radius at highest concavity were significantly reduced (P<0.05 in all). In the FS-LASIK group, there was a significant increase in deformation amplitude (DA) (P=0.001), and significant decreases in A2-length (P=0.004). Peak distance increased in the PRK-MMC group (P=0.029). At 6 months, after controlling for fellow eye correlations and preoperative corneal thickness between the two groups, decreases in IOP, A1-time, A2-length and radius, and the increase in DA was greater in FS-LASIK.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated significant changes in Corvis ST ocular biomechanical metrics after both PRK-MMC and FS-LASIK in high myopic patients, indicating the significant effect of excimer laser refractive surgery on corneal biomechanical properties. However, changes that occur with FS-LASIK are more significant than with PRK-MMC. Further randomized studies are needed to better characterize the pattern of biomechanical changes associated with each type of surgery.
METHODS: In this prospective comparative interventional case series, 60 patients (30 patients in each group) with a manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) greater than 7.0 D were enrolled. Corvis ST parameters were measured before and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Preoperatively, mean MRSE was -8.65±1.51 D in FS-LASIK and -8.04±1.70 D in PRK-MMC groups (P=0.149), and corneal thickness was 570.67±36.79 μm and 507.12±32.55 μm, respectively (P<0.001). At 6 months, both groups showed significantly higher applanation (A) 2 time and A2-velocity (P<0.05 in both), whereas intraocular pressure (IOP), corrected IOP, A1 time, A1-velocity, and radius at highest concavity were significantly reduced (P<0.05 in all). In the FS-LASIK group, there was a significant increase in deformation amplitude (DA) (P=0.001), and significant decreases in A2-length (P=0.004). Peak distance increased in the PRK-MMC group (P=0.029). At 6 months, after controlling for fellow eye correlations and preoperative corneal thickness between the two groups, decreases in IOP, A1-time, A2-length and radius, and the increase in DA was greater in FS-LASIK.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated significant changes in Corvis ST ocular biomechanical metrics after both PRK-MMC and FS-LASIK in high myopic patients, indicating the significant effect of excimer laser refractive surgery on corneal biomechanical properties. However, changes that occur with FS-LASIK are more significant than with PRK-MMC. Further randomized studies are needed to better characterize the pattern of biomechanical changes associated with each type of surgery.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app