We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Long-time "real-life" performance of the subcutaneous ICD in patients with electrical heart disease or idiopathic ventricular fibrillation.
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology : An International Journal of Arrhythmias and Pacing 2016 November
BACKGROUNDS: The totally subcutaneous implantable defibrillator (S-ICD) has been designed as a new alternative to conventional implantable defibrillators. This system is especially attractive for young patients. However, long-term experience is not yet available. To address the question whether the S-ICD system is safe and feasible for young patients with electrical heart disease or idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (VF), the data of a standard of care prospective single center S-ICD registry were evaluated.
METHODS: In the present study, 24 patients (age 34.2 ± 11.5 years) with electrical heart disease or idiopathic VF received an S-ICD for primary (n = 8) or secondary prevention (n = 16). The mean follow-up duration was 29.6 ± 15.1 months.
RESULTS: Ventricular arrhythmias were adequately detected in four patients (17 %). In three patients (13 %) oversensing was noticed and led to at least one inappropriate shock in two patients (8 %). Further adverse events included surgical revision due to a mobile pulse generator as well as explantation of one system and switch to a transvenous ICD system due to several ineffective shocks.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study suggest that S-ICD therapy may be an attractive alternative in young patients with electrical heart disease or idiopathic VF. However, episodes of oversensing as well as ineffective shocks may occur.
METHODS: In the present study, 24 patients (age 34.2 ± 11.5 years) with electrical heart disease or idiopathic VF received an S-ICD for primary (n = 8) or secondary prevention (n = 16). The mean follow-up duration was 29.6 ± 15.1 months.
RESULTS: Ventricular arrhythmias were adequately detected in four patients (17 %). In three patients (13 %) oversensing was noticed and led to at least one inappropriate shock in two patients (8 %). Further adverse events included surgical revision due to a mobile pulse generator as well as explantation of one system and switch to a transvenous ICD system due to several ineffective shocks.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study suggest that S-ICD therapy may be an attractive alternative in young patients with electrical heart disease or idiopathic VF. However, episodes of oversensing as well as ineffective shocks may occur.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app