On- versus off-hour care for patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in Germany : Exemplary results within the chest pain unit concept.

AIM: The aim of this study was to analyze differences in the timing of invasive management of patients with high-risk acute coronary syndrome without persistent ST-segment elevation (hr-NSTE-ACS) or myocardial infarction without persistent ST-segment elevation (NSTEMI) between on- and off-hours in a German chest pain unit (CPU).

PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 160 NSTEMI patients in the study, who were admitted to two German CPUs in 2013. Patients presenting on weekdays between 8 a.m. and 6 p.m. were compared with patients presenting during off-hours. Data analysis included time intervals from admission to invasive management (goals: for hr-NSTE-ACS, <2 h; for NSTEMI, <24 h) and the resulting guideline adherence.

RESULTS: Guideline-adherent timing of an invasive strategy did not differ significantly between the on-hour (6.5 h [3.0-22.0 h], 79.9 %) and off-hour groups (10.5 h [2.0-20.0 h], 75.3 %; p = 0.94), without additional significant differences between admissions during off-hours Monday to Thursday and weekends (10.0 h [2.0-19.0 h], 75.6 % vs. 7.5 h [2.0-20.0 h], 76.2 %; p = 0.96).

CONCLUSION: Our exemplary experience in two different German CPUs demonstrates adequate timing of coronary catheterization in over 75 % of cases, irrespective of admission during on- or off-hours. Nationwide validation of our findings by the German CPU registry is mandatory.