Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Preclinical pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, radiation dosimetry and toxicity studies required for regulatory approval of a phase I clinical trial with (111)In-CP04 in medullary thyroid carcinoma patients.

INTRODUCTION: From a series of radiolabelled cholecystokinin (CCK) and gastrin analogues, (111)In-CP04 ((111)In-DOTA-(DGlu)6-Ala-Tyr-Gly-Trp-Met-Asp-Phe-NH2) was selected for further translation as a diagnostic radiopharmaceutical towards a first-in-man study in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). A freeze-dried kit formulation for multicentre application has been developed. We herein report on biosafety, in vivo stability, biodistribution and dosimetry aspects of (111)In-CP04 in animal models, essential for the regulatory approval of the clinical trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Acute and extended single dose toxicity of CP04 was tested in rodents, while the in vivo stability of (111)In-CP04 was assessed by HPLC analysis of mouse blood samples. The biodistribution of (111)In-CP04 prepared from a freeze-dried kit was studied in SCID mice bearing double A431-CCK2R(±) xenografts at 1, 4 and 24h pi. Further 4-h animal groups were either additionally treated with the plasma expander gelofusine or injected with (111)In-CP04 prepared by wet-labelling. Pharmacokinetics in healthy mice included the 30min, 1, 4, 24, 48 and 72h time points pi. Dosimetric calculations were based on extrapolation of mice data to humans adopting two scaling models.

RESULTS: CP04 was well-tolerated by both mice and rats, with an LD50>178.5μg/kg body weight for mice and a NOAEL (no-observed-adverse-effect-level) of 89μg/kg body weight for rats. After labelling, (111)In-CP04 remained >70% intact in peripheral mouse blood at 5min pi. The uptake of (111)In-CP04 prepared from the freeze-dried kit and by wet-labelling were comparable in the A431-CCK2R(+)-xenografts (9.24±1.35%ID/g and 8.49±0.39%ID/g, respectively; P>0.05). Gelofusine-treated mice exhibited significantly reduced kidneys values (1.69±0.15%ID/g vs. 5.55±0.94%ID/g in controls, P<0.001). Dosimetry data revealed very comparable effective tumour doses for the two scaling models applied, of 0.045 and 0.044mSv/MBq.

CONCLUSION: The present study has provided convincing toxicology, biodistribution and dosimetry data for prompt implementation of the freeze-dried kit formulation without or with gelofusine administration in a multicentre clinical trial in MTC patients.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app