We have located links that may give you full text access.
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma: Impact of Disease Risk and Post Allograft Minimal Residual Disease on Survival.
Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia 2016 July
BACKGROUND: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is a potentially curative option for multiple myeloma (MM). We analyzed our experience of allo-HCT in MM and examined outcomes in 77 consecutive patients with MM receiving allo-HCT from matched sibling (n = 69) or unrelated donors (n = 8). The primary objectives were to assess overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and non-relapse mortality in these patients.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-six patients received non-myeloablative/reduced-intensity conditioning regimens, while 11 received myeloablative regimens. The median follow-up of survivors was 50 months (range, 2.3-129.3 months).
RESULTS: Twenty-seven (35.1%) patients had high-risk cytogenetics at diagnosis (t (4:14), 17p deletion, chromosome 1 abnormality, or t (14:16)). All of patients except 1 had prior auto transplant. On multivariate analysis, older age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.055; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.001 = 1.11; P = .04), less than complete remission (CR) at allo-HCT (HR, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.3-14.1; P = .006), and cytomegalovirus reactivation (HR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.38-7.6; P = .002) were associated with higher mortality risk. Less than CR at allo-HCT was also associated with higher risk for non-relapse mortality (HR, 5.8; 95% CI, 1.3-26.3; P = .02). There was no difference in OS or PFS between high-risk and standard-risk cytogenetics. No difference in OS and PFS was seen in those who had morphological complete response regardless of the minimal residual disease status.
CONCLUSION: Allotransplant benefited younger patients and those in CR at the time of transplant. The adverse effect of high-risk cytogenetics may be overcome by the allo-HCT.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-six patients received non-myeloablative/reduced-intensity conditioning regimens, while 11 received myeloablative regimens. The median follow-up of survivors was 50 months (range, 2.3-129.3 months).
RESULTS: Twenty-seven (35.1%) patients had high-risk cytogenetics at diagnosis (t (4:14), 17p deletion, chromosome 1 abnormality, or t (14:16)). All of patients except 1 had prior auto transplant. On multivariate analysis, older age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.055; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.001 = 1.11; P = .04), less than complete remission (CR) at allo-HCT (HR, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.3-14.1; P = .006), and cytomegalovirus reactivation (HR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.38-7.6; P = .002) were associated with higher mortality risk. Less than CR at allo-HCT was also associated with higher risk for non-relapse mortality (HR, 5.8; 95% CI, 1.3-26.3; P = .02). There was no difference in OS or PFS between high-risk and standard-risk cytogenetics. No difference in OS and PFS was seen in those who had morphological complete response regardless of the minimal residual disease status.
CONCLUSION: Allotransplant benefited younger patients and those in CR at the time of transplant. The adverse effect of high-risk cytogenetics may be overcome by the allo-HCT.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app