Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm - Results and Prognostic Factors at a Certified Centre of Vascular Surgery].

Introduction: Although the perioperative management has been optimised over the past few decades, there has not been a remarkable improvement in the mortality rates of patients with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA). The aim of this retrospective trial was to define pre-, intra- and postoperative parameters which influence the perioperative and long-term outcome of patients and which can be modified by the operating team. Methods: A retrospective database analysis was performed in 49 patients who had undergone an operation of rAAA in our certified centre of vascular surgery between the beginning of 2006 and the end of 2012. The minimal follow-up period was 30 months. The statistical analysis was done univariately using the Kaplan-Meier method and a log-rank-test, and multivariately with the Cox model. Results: Intrahospital mortality was 40.8 %, perioperative mortality (30 postoperative days) was 28.9 %. The survival rate for 1 year was 52.4 %; the survival rate for 5 years was 45.3 %. In the univariate analysis, significant differences in the early postoperative survival rates were found depending on preoperative systolic blood pressure, preoperative haemoglobin (< 10 vs. ≥ 10 g/dl), the intraoperative need of blood and frozen plasma transfusions, type of perforation, type of AAA, the need for further surgical interventions, postoperative MOF, acute kidney failure and postoperative septicaemia. The late survival rates were significantly influenced by the type of perforation and AAA, pre-existing coronary disease and diabetes mellitus in fully identified patients discharged from hospital (n = 27). In the multivariate analysis pursuant to the Cox model, patients with pre-existing coronary disease had a 3.9-fold higher relative risk to die after the operation of rAAA, while patients with a free perforation of the rAA had a 10-fold higher relative risk. Conclusion: The high mortality of rAAA is caused by haemorrhagic shock and its complications, which are mostly non-surgical. Therapeutic efforts should focus on those perioperative parameters which can be modified by the treating teams. Alongside the centralisation of rAAA in high-volume-departments of vascular surgery, the systematic sonographic screening for asymptomatic AAA in the population older than 65 years should be enforced. A possible advantage of EVAR in rAAA has yet to be shown by trials in progress such as IMPROVE, AJAX and RCAR.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app