COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Functional Relevance of Relative Maintenance of Maximal Eccentric Quadriceps Torque in Healthy Old Adults.

BACKGROUND: Old referenced to young adults show a relative maintenance of maximal eccentric (RELM) compared to concentric muscle torque: ∼76 and ∼59%, respectively. However, it is unknown if RELM affords functional benefits in old adults.

OBJECTIVE: We examined if there is specificity between the two types of peak quadriceps torque (i.e., concentric and eccentric) and timed gait performance measured during level, ramp, and stair walking and if gait performance was higher in old adults with high versus low RELM.

METHODS: We measured peak concentric and eccentric quadriceps torque at 60 and 120°/s and timed gait at habitual and safe-fast speeds in healthy young (age 22.7 years, n = 24) and old (age 70.0 years, n = 21) adults.

RESULTS: Comparable to previous studies, RELM was 21%, but instead of the anticipated specificity, we found that concentric compared with eccentric torque was more strongly associated with gait performance than eccentric torque, independently of walking direction and age (R2 = 0.16: eccentric vs. descending gaits; R2 = 0.17: eccentric vs. ascending gaits; R2 = 0.45: concentric vs. descending gaits; R2 = 0.56: concentric vs. ascending gaits, n = 45, all p < 0.01). Furthermore, old adults (n = 10) with ∼30% greater than normal levels of RELM (n = 11) ambulated at similar velocities measured on level and inclined surfaces.

CONCLUSION: Normal and 30% above normal levels of RELM do not seem to increase or predict healthy old adults' gait performance on level and inclined surfaces. Future work should examine if RELM is associated with a heightened performance in other measures of neuromuscular function, such as gait biomechanics, muscle activation, as well as rate and control of voluntary force development in old adults with high or low mobility.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app