We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Observational Study
Analyzing biomechanical parameters of the cornea with glaucoma severity in open-angle glaucoma.
PURPOSE: The purpose was to investigate a possible association of corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) with open-angle glaucoma and the severity of disease.
METHODS: In this prospective cross-sectional study we recruited 86 open-angle glaucoma patients, 16 patients with ocular hypertension (OHT,) and 44 age-matched controls. Each participant had a complete glaucoma workup including measurements with the Ocular Response Analyzer and computerized perimetry with the Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard program. Visual field damage was based on mean deviation (MD) and considered as early glaucomatous with a MD > - 6 dB, moderate glaucomatous between -6 and -12 dB and advanced glaucomatous < -12 dB. The association between ORA parameters, glaucoma, and disease severity was evaluated using univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses.
RESULTS: There was a statistically significant correlation between the biomechanical parameters and intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, axial length, and age. On average, glaucoma patients had the lowest adjusted CH (8.96 ± 1.43 mmHg) and CRF (9.07 ± 1.93 mmHg) values in comparison to OHT patients (CH: 10.2 ± 1.5 mmHg; CRF: 10.6 ± 2.1 mmHg) and controls (CH: 9.7 ± 1.4 mmHg; CRF: 10.2 ± 1.9 mmHg). This difference was statistically significant (CH: p = 0.003; CRF: p = 0.008). There was also a statistically significant difference in adjusted CH (p = 0.001) and CRF (p = 0.004) values between the controls and the visual field groups, with the lowest values being in the most advanced group.
CONCLUSIONS: Before interpreting corneal biomechanical parameters, it seems important to adjust the measured data for their underlying influencing factors. Glaucoma patients with lower adjusted CH and CRF probably have more advanced disease and should, therefore, be treated more aggressively and monitored more carefully and frequently.
METHODS: In this prospective cross-sectional study we recruited 86 open-angle glaucoma patients, 16 patients with ocular hypertension (OHT,) and 44 age-matched controls. Each participant had a complete glaucoma workup including measurements with the Ocular Response Analyzer and computerized perimetry with the Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard program. Visual field damage was based on mean deviation (MD) and considered as early glaucomatous with a MD > - 6 dB, moderate glaucomatous between -6 and -12 dB and advanced glaucomatous < -12 dB. The association between ORA parameters, glaucoma, and disease severity was evaluated using univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses.
RESULTS: There was a statistically significant correlation between the biomechanical parameters and intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, axial length, and age. On average, glaucoma patients had the lowest adjusted CH (8.96 ± 1.43 mmHg) and CRF (9.07 ± 1.93 mmHg) values in comparison to OHT patients (CH: 10.2 ± 1.5 mmHg; CRF: 10.6 ± 2.1 mmHg) and controls (CH: 9.7 ± 1.4 mmHg; CRF: 10.2 ± 1.9 mmHg). This difference was statistically significant (CH: p = 0.003; CRF: p = 0.008). There was also a statistically significant difference in adjusted CH (p = 0.001) and CRF (p = 0.004) values between the controls and the visual field groups, with the lowest values being in the most advanced group.
CONCLUSIONS: Before interpreting corneal biomechanical parameters, it seems important to adjust the measured data for their underlying influencing factors. Glaucoma patients with lower adjusted CH and CRF probably have more advanced disease and should, therefore, be treated more aggressively and monitored more carefully and frequently.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app