Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparison of Drug Acceptance and Anxiety Between Intranasal and Sublingual Midazolam Sedation.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to assess and compare the changes in anxiety level and drug acceptance after intranasal and sublingual midazolam sedation.

METHODS: Forty three- to seven-year-olds were randomly assigned to Group A (N equals 20; 0.2 mg/kg intranasal midazolam sedation) or Group B (N equals 20; 0.2 mg/kg sublingual midazolam sedation) sedation. The anxiety levels at various time periods were assessed from recorded videos using the Venham clinical anxiety scale by two pediatric dentists. The acceptance of the drug administration was assessed using a four-point scale. The Wilcoxon signed rank test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical analysis using SPSS 17.0 software.

RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in anxiety level from baseline to 20 minutes after drug administration in Group A (P<0.001) and Group B (P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the anxiety level between the two groups. The sublingual route of drug administration was better accepted (P=0.001) than the intranasal route of drug administration.

CONCLUSIONS: Both intranasal and sublingual administrations of midazolam were equally effective in reducing the child's anxiety. The sublingual route of drug administration was better accepted than the intranasal route.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app