We have located links that may give you full text access.
Reduction malarplasty using a zygomatic arch-lifting technique.
BACKGROUND: Broad or excessive malar protrusion is a trait associated with aggression and old age in Asian cultures. Although various methods of shifting the zygoma have been introduced for reduction malarplasty, soft tissue sagging and inadequate bony union still remain great challenges. We have devised an arch-lifting technique that helps overcome these issues. An analysis of surgical outcomes is presented herein.
METHODS: A total of 54 patients subjected to lifting malar reductions between January 2013 and November 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. The reduction procedure entailed an L-shaped osteotomy of the zygomaticomaxillary junction via an intraoral approach. In addition, a prefabricated U-shaped microplate was applied for arch fixation in the lifted position. The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 18 months (average, 9.2 months), during which medical records, photographs, and facial bone computed tomography (CT) images were obtained to assess the postoperative results.
RESULTS: Patients were generally satisfied with aesthetic outcomes, thus rating the procedure excellent in terms of zygomatic prominence, midfacial width, symmetry, and resistance to cheek drooping. There were no major complications, such as facial nerve damage or trismus. An inadequate bony contact occurred in two instances due to unanticipated trauma, with immediate reduction and fixation thereafter. Minor wound infections developed in three patients but responded well to antibiotics.
CONCLUSION: Zygomatic reduction procedures must consider the dynamics of the adjacent muscles, which are stabilized through arch fixation. The use of our arch-lifting technique for reduction malarplasty efficiently elevates the zygomatic complex, thereby ensuring an adequate bone-to-bone contact. Predictable and accurate outcomes are thereby achieved.
METHODS: A total of 54 patients subjected to lifting malar reductions between January 2013 and November 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. The reduction procedure entailed an L-shaped osteotomy of the zygomaticomaxillary junction via an intraoral approach. In addition, a prefabricated U-shaped microplate was applied for arch fixation in the lifted position. The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 18 months (average, 9.2 months), during which medical records, photographs, and facial bone computed tomography (CT) images were obtained to assess the postoperative results.
RESULTS: Patients were generally satisfied with aesthetic outcomes, thus rating the procedure excellent in terms of zygomatic prominence, midfacial width, symmetry, and resistance to cheek drooping. There were no major complications, such as facial nerve damage or trismus. An inadequate bony contact occurred in two instances due to unanticipated trauma, with immediate reduction and fixation thereafter. Minor wound infections developed in three patients but responded well to antibiotics.
CONCLUSION: Zygomatic reduction procedures must consider the dynamics of the adjacent muscles, which are stabilized through arch fixation. The use of our arch-lifting technique for reduction malarplasty efficiently elevates the zygomatic complex, thereby ensuring an adequate bone-to-bone contact. Predictable and accurate outcomes are thereby achieved.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app