We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Comparing Percutaneous Treatments of Trigeminal Neuralgia: 19 Years of Experience in a Single Centre.
BACKGROUND: Glycerol rhizolysis, thermocoagulation, and balloon compression are well established in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome profile of these 3 percutaneous procedures in a single centre over a long follow-up period.
METHODS: Over 19 years, 393 procedures were performed on 210 trigeminal neuralgia patients. Patient records and telephone follow-up were used to determine demographic and operative details and surgical outcomes. The length of follow-up extended to over 17 years.
RESULTS: The initial rates of complete pain relief with or without medication were 72% for glycerol, 80% for thermocoagulation, and 86% for balloon compression. Kaplan-Meier analysis of recurrence times showed that balloon compression provides significantly longer relief than the other 2 procedures. Complication rates for glycerol, thermocoagulation, and balloon compression were 30.3, 27.1, and 43.5%, respectively. Analysis of repeat procedures showed no difference in recurrence times for balloon compression or thermocoagulation compared with primary procedures, but repeat glycerol procedures gave shorter recurrence times.
CONCLUSION: Balloon compression provides longer pain relief than glycerol and thermocoagulation. Although balloon compression is more likely to give numbness and complications, the complications are largely minor and transitory. Moreover, balloon compression following previous percutaneous procedures remains highly effective.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome profile of these 3 percutaneous procedures in a single centre over a long follow-up period.
METHODS: Over 19 years, 393 procedures were performed on 210 trigeminal neuralgia patients. Patient records and telephone follow-up were used to determine demographic and operative details and surgical outcomes. The length of follow-up extended to over 17 years.
RESULTS: The initial rates of complete pain relief with or without medication were 72% for glycerol, 80% for thermocoagulation, and 86% for balloon compression. Kaplan-Meier analysis of recurrence times showed that balloon compression provides significantly longer relief than the other 2 procedures. Complication rates for glycerol, thermocoagulation, and balloon compression were 30.3, 27.1, and 43.5%, respectively. Analysis of repeat procedures showed no difference in recurrence times for balloon compression or thermocoagulation compared with primary procedures, but repeat glycerol procedures gave shorter recurrence times.
CONCLUSION: Balloon compression provides longer pain relief than glycerol and thermocoagulation. Although balloon compression is more likely to give numbness and complications, the complications are largely minor and transitory. Moreover, balloon compression following previous percutaneous procedures remains highly effective.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app