Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Prospective 30-Day Outcome Evaluation of a Fast-Track Protocol for 23-Hour Ambulatory Primary and Revisional Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in 820 Consecutive Unselected Patients.

BACKGROUND: Results from validated national databases suggest that a 1-day length of stay (LOS) is not only unattainable in more than 20% of primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) operations, but it is also associated with an increased 30-day mortality risk. There are no published data regarding the feasibility and safety of 1-day LOS after revisional LRYGB.

STUDY DESIGN: We reviewed 1 surgeon's experience after implementation of a 1-day fast-track protocol (FTP) in 784 primary and 36 revisional consecutive LRYGB patients. Patient demographics, comorbidities, preoperative laboratory values, diagnostic work-up, operative characteristics, LOS, 30-day outcomes, and patient satisfaction scores were prospectively collected in a deidentified registry. Predictors of longer hospitalization were assessed by univariate and multiple regression analysis.

RESULTS: One-day LOS was accomplished in 71.9% primary and 58.3% revisional LRYGBs. Median LOS was 1 day for primary and revisional LRYGB and mean lengths of stay were 1.34 and 1.63 days, respectively. "Excellent" or "very good" satisfaction ratings were reported regarding the FTP education provided (95.3%), surgeon's accessibility (98.3%), and hospital care (86.5%). Only 0.34% of patients who had a 1-day LOS indicated that they would benefit from an additional in-hospital stay. In multivariate analysis, independent predictors of longer hospitalization included prolonged operative time, hemoglobin reduction, reoperation for primary LRYGB, and operative time for revisional LRYGB.

CONCLUSIONS: A 1-day FTP can be successfully implemented in the majority of primary and revisional LRYGB patients regardless of preoperative patient characteristics without increasing the risk of 30-day morbidity, mortality, reoperations, readmissions, emergency department or outpatient fluid visits, or reducing patient satisfaction.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app