We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
[Establishment and clinical application of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric method for simultaneous determination of plasma 5-fluorouracil].
Zhonghua Yi Xue za Zhi [Chinese medical journal] 2016 March 16
OBJECTIVE: To develop a robust liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric (LC-MS/MS) method for determination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in blood plasma and evaluate the use of 5-FU for treatment response surveillance as well as toxicity prediction in malignant gastrointestinal tumors.
METHODS: A LC-MS/MS method was used, with signal linearity, lower limits of quantitation, precision, accuracy and stability being evaluated according to guideline US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s guidance for industry bioanalytical method validation.Analysis of 5-FU was performed in 35 gastrointestinal cancer patients admitted to Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University from April 2013 to December 2013. The relationship between 5-FU with toxicity and treatment effect was compared.
RESULTS: The linear ranges of 5-FU was 49-9 800 ng/ml, the lower limit of quantitation was 49.0 ng/ml. The within-run and between-run coefficients of variation (CV) of 5-FU was <3% and <6%.The recovery rates of low, medium and high level quality controls were 103.36%, 88.12% and 91.26% respectively; with standard added recovery of 109.69%, 91.06% and 88.81% respectively. The control added recoveries were 112.16%, 99.12% and 92.28% respectively. The bias was -11.69%, 2.42% and -8.09% when samples were repeated freezing and thawing twice (-80 ℃). The results had a bias -11.97%, 1.42%, -10.91% and 0.56%, 0.14%, 3.82% when samples were kept at 2-8 ℃ for 2 days and 14 days. In 35 gastrointestinal cancer patients, there was no correlation between initial dose of 5-FU and 44 h AUC (concentration 3.44-53.43 mg/L·h). The risk of chemotherapy-related adverse effect in 5-Fu 44 h AUC> 30 mg/L·h group was significantly higher than 44 h AUC < 30 mg/L·h group (χ(2)=12.600, P<0.01). While the chemotherapy response of AUC > 20 mg/L·h group was significantly satisfactory than AUC < 20 mg/L·h group (χ(2)=5.358, P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: A robust and reliable LC-MS/MS method for the determination of 5-FU in blood plasma has been developed and it is suitable for clinical application. Detecting 5-FU may guide individualized treatment and predict adverse events.
METHODS: A LC-MS/MS method was used, with signal linearity, lower limits of quantitation, precision, accuracy and stability being evaluated according to guideline US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s guidance for industry bioanalytical method validation.Analysis of 5-FU was performed in 35 gastrointestinal cancer patients admitted to Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University from April 2013 to December 2013. The relationship between 5-FU with toxicity and treatment effect was compared.
RESULTS: The linear ranges of 5-FU was 49-9 800 ng/ml, the lower limit of quantitation was 49.0 ng/ml. The within-run and between-run coefficients of variation (CV) of 5-FU was <3% and <6%.The recovery rates of low, medium and high level quality controls were 103.36%, 88.12% and 91.26% respectively; with standard added recovery of 109.69%, 91.06% and 88.81% respectively. The control added recoveries were 112.16%, 99.12% and 92.28% respectively. The bias was -11.69%, 2.42% and -8.09% when samples were repeated freezing and thawing twice (-80 ℃). The results had a bias -11.97%, 1.42%, -10.91% and 0.56%, 0.14%, 3.82% when samples were kept at 2-8 ℃ for 2 days and 14 days. In 35 gastrointestinal cancer patients, there was no correlation between initial dose of 5-FU and 44 h AUC (concentration 3.44-53.43 mg/L·h). The risk of chemotherapy-related adverse effect in 5-Fu 44 h AUC> 30 mg/L·h group was significantly higher than 44 h AUC < 30 mg/L·h group (χ(2)=12.600, P<0.01). While the chemotherapy response of AUC > 20 mg/L·h group was significantly satisfactory than AUC < 20 mg/L·h group (χ(2)=5.358, P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: A robust and reliable LC-MS/MS method for the determination of 5-FU in blood plasma has been developed and it is suitable for clinical application. Detecting 5-FU may guide individualized treatment and predict adverse events.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app