Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Patient-reported symptoms and functioning as indicators of mortality in advanced cystic fibrosis: A new tool for referral and selection for lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Despite well-known risk factors and predictive survival models, many patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) die while on the waiting list for lung transplant. We evaluated whether specific Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire (CFQ-R) scales provide additional benefit to conventional tools in identifying referral timing and waitlist mortality.

METHODS: From January 2010 to January 2015, 152 patients (34% on the waitlist) were evaluated with the CFQ-R and standard protocol quarterly. Data were used to explore the prognostic association of health-related quality of life.

RESULTS: The Physical Functioning domain (PFD) of the CFQ-R predicted mortality in advanced CF disease better than habitual parameters (p = 0.005). For patients with the same forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), a low score categorized patients with an increased risk of death. For patients with CF and FEV1 <30% predicted and a low Physical score, mortality rate was ~35% at 2 years. The best model for probability of inclusion on the waitlist was FEV1 % (p < 0.001, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.90, 0.97]) and Physical Functioning (p = 0.013, HR = 0.96; 95% CI [0.95, 0.99]). The best model for probability of death similarly included FEV1 % (p = 0.09, HR = 0.97; 95% CI [0.94, 1.00]) and CFQ-R Physical Functioning score (p = 0.005, HR = 0.97; 95% CI [0.95, 0.99]). The Health Perception score showed similar results. A low Health Perception score combined with a high resting heart rate showed a trend for mortality.

CONCLUSIONS: The CFQ-R may be an additional tool for guiding decisions to place a patient with CF on the waiting list for lung transplantation. The CFQ-R Physical Functioning and Health Perception scales were more accurate than conventional tools in predicting death before transplant.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app