JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Eosinophil Quantitated Urine Kinetic: A novel assay for assessment of eosinophilic esophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic disease that requires long-term medical management and monitoring. The eosinophil count determined during esophageal biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis and monitoring of EoE. Although markers of eosinophil degranulation correlate with symptoms, eosinophil counts do not correlate. Development of a noninvasive, cost-effective biomarker of eosinophil activation for the evaluation of EoE is an unmet medical need.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a proof-of-concept study to evaluate the potential for measuring urinary 3-bromotyrosine (3-BT) levels in creatinine normalized urine for quantifying eosinophil degranulation in EoE disease.

METHODS: A mass spectrometry-based method of measuring normalized 3-BT levels, the Eosinophil Quantitated Urine Kinetic (EoQUIK), was developed, and proof-of-concept evaluation was performed for patients with EoE (n = 27), atopic controls (n = 24), and nonatopic controls (n = 24).

RESULTS: EoQUIK revealed that median normalized 3-BT levels were increased 93-fold in patients with EoE compared with nonatopic controls (P = .01) and increased 13-fold in patients with EoE compared with atopic controls (P = .01). Cutoff thresholds were selected for EoQUIK that yielded a specificity of 100% and a negative predictive value of 100% for nonatopic controls and a specificity of 79% and a negative predictive value of 90% for atopic controls. In a logistic regression model, a urine 3-BT level greater than 20 pg per 400 mg of creatinine increased the odds of a patient having EoE by 4.8 (95% confidence interval, 1.14-20.5; P = .03) when compared with atopic controls after controlling for race and sex.

CONCLUSION: These data provide proof of concept that EoQUIK can potentially be a useful noninvasive clinical tool in the evaluation of possible EoE.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app