Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Factors influencing quality of sleep among non-mechanically ventilated patients in the Intensive Care Unit.

AIM: To investigate the self-reported quality of sleep of non-mechanically ventilated patients admitted to an ICU, and to identify barriers to sleep in this setting.

METHOD: Patients admitted to the ICU of Frankston Hospital over a two month period who had spent at least one night in the ICU, and had not received mechanical ventilation were surveyed as they were discharged from the ICU. This survey required patients to rate the quality of their sleep in the ICU and at home immediately prior to hospitalisation on a 10cm visual analogue scale; and to identify perceived barriers to sleep in the ICU and at home prior to hospitalisation.

RESULTS: 56 respondents were surveyed during the study period. Median age was 74 years (range=18-92 years); median ICU length of stay was 1 day (range=1-7 days). Overall, respondents rated their quality of sleep in ICU (median=4.9/10) as significantly worse than at home immediately prior to ICU admission (median=7.15/10; Z=-3.02, p<0.002); however 44% of respondents rated their quality of sleep in ICU as better, or no worse, than at home immediately prior to hospitalisation. Sub-group analysis revealed that among patients with reduced quality of sleep (<5/10) prior to hospitalisation, 71.4% rated their quality of sleep in ICU as better, or no worse, than at home prior to hospitalisation, with no significant difference between sleep quality ratings in ICU and at home (p=0.341). Respondents identified the following as barriers to sleep in the ICU: noise levels overnight (53.6%); discomfort (33.9%); pain (32.1%); being awoken for procedures (32%); being attached to medical devices (28.6%); stress/anxiety (26.8%); and light levels (23.2%).

CONCLUSION: Pre-hospitalisation sleep quality appears to be an important influence on sleep in ICU. Many barriers to sleep in the ICU identified by respondents are potentially modifiable.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app