Laparoscopic-assisted transanal pull-through (LATP) versus complete transanal pull-through (CTP) in the surgical management of Hirschsprung's disease.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether laparoscopic-assisted transanal pull-through (LATP) or complete transanal pull-through (CTP) is superior for the surgical management of Hirschsprung's disease. We compared outcomes between approaches.

METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with Hirschsprung's disease who underwent LATP or CTP at our centre between 1995 and 2014. Patients were matched based on age, birth weight, and level of aganglionosis. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were also performed.

RESULTS: From our data, LATP (n=24) took significantly longer than CTP (n=12; 3.9±1.1 vs. 2.6±0.6h, p=0.001). There was no difference in length of stay or incidence of postoperative complications. A literature search identified 17 published studies, of which 2 were comparative. Our pooled analysis of comparative studies including our results showed that operative time was significantly longer for the LATP group (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.21-1.96, p<0.001). There was no significant difference in major complications (OR 1.75, 95% CI 0.76-4.04, p=0.19) or length of stay (OR 0.33, 95% CI -0.41 to 1.08, p=0.38).

CONCLUSION: Clinical outcomes are comparable between LATP and CTP. CTP offers shorter operative time without the need for laparoscopic instruments.