We have located links that may give you full text access.
EVALUATION STUDIES
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
The Impact of Function-Flow Interaction on Left Ventricular Efficiency in Patients with Conduction Abnormalities: A Particle Image Velocimetry and Tissue Doppler Study.
BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to assess the influence of left bundle branch block (LBBB)-like conduction abnormalities on left ventricular (LV) blood flow patterns and to characterize their potential impact on LV efficiency by measuring the changes in vortex formation and energy dissipation in the left ventricle using echocardiographic particle image velocimetry.
METHODS: Thirty-six subjects were prospectively studied, including 20 patients with pacemakers, six patients with LBBB, and 10 healthy control subjects, all of whom had normal ejection fractions (>50%). In patients with pacemakers, data were acquired in both DDD and AAI modes. Standard grayscale, tissue Doppler myocardial imaging, and contrast-enhanced echocardiographic particle image velocimetric data were acquired, and LV flow patterns were analyzed using dedicated software. Dyssynchrony was quantified by measuring apical transverse motion.
RESULTS: Apical transverse motion was significantly higher in patients with LBBB compared with normal control subjects (mean, 4.9 ± 1.9 vs 1.0 ± 0.7 mm; P < .001). Quantitative measures of vortex energy dissipation (relative strength, vortex relative strength, and vortex pulsation correlation) were significantly higher in patients with LBBB (2.05 ± 0.54, 0.53 ± 0.13, and 0.87 ± 0.47, respectively) compared with control subjects (1.48 ± 0.28, 0.33 ± 0.05, and 0.24 ± 0.51, respectively) (P < .02 for all). Vortex duration time in relation to the entire cardiac cycle was shorter in patients with LBBB than in control subjects (28% vs 44%). All findings in both groups were comparable with DDD and AAI.
CONCLUSION: LV flow pattern analysis by echocardiographic particle image velocimetry reveals that conduction delay due to LBBB or pacemaker stimulation in the right ventricle (DDD) disturbs the transfer of kinetic energy during the cardiac cycle and causes less efficient LV function. These data contribute to a better understanding of hemodynamic consequences of conduction delays and may help in the optimization of therapeutic approaches.
METHODS: Thirty-six subjects were prospectively studied, including 20 patients with pacemakers, six patients with LBBB, and 10 healthy control subjects, all of whom had normal ejection fractions (>50%). In patients with pacemakers, data were acquired in both DDD and AAI modes. Standard grayscale, tissue Doppler myocardial imaging, and contrast-enhanced echocardiographic particle image velocimetric data were acquired, and LV flow patterns were analyzed using dedicated software. Dyssynchrony was quantified by measuring apical transverse motion.
RESULTS: Apical transverse motion was significantly higher in patients with LBBB compared with normal control subjects (mean, 4.9 ± 1.9 vs 1.0 ± 0.7 mm; P < .001). Quantitative measures of vortex energy dissipation (relative strength, vortex relative strength, and vortex pulsation correlation) were significantly higher in patients with LBBB (2.05 ± 0.54, 0.53 ± 0.13, and 0.87 ± 0.47, respectively) compared with control subjects (1.48 ± 0.28, 0.33 ± 0.05, and 0.24 ± 0.51, respectively) (P < .02 for all). Vortex duration time in relation to the entire cardiac cycle was shorter in patients with LBBB than in control subjects (28% vs 44%). All findings in both groups were comparable with DDD and AAI.
CONCLUSION: LV flow pattern analysis by echocardiographic particle image velocimetry reveals that conduction delay due to LBBB or pacemaker stimulation in the right ventricle (DDD) disturbs the transfer of kinetic energy during the cardiac cycle and causes less efficient LV function. These data contribute to a better understanding of hemodynamic consequences of conduction delays and may help in the optimization of therapeutic approaches.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app