Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Results of a Feeding Protocol in Patients Undergoing the Hybrid Procedure.

Neonates with single-ventricle physiology are at increased risk of developing gastrointestinal morbidities. Feeding protocols in this patient population have been shown to decrease feeding complications after the Norwood procedure, but no data exist to determine the effectiveness of a feeding protocol in patients undergoing the hybrid procedure. Goal of this study was to examine the impact of a standardized feeding protocol on the incidence of overall postoperative gastrointestinal morbidity after the hybrid procedure. Retrospective chart review was performed on neonates undergoing the hybrid procedure. Neonates were divided into two groups, pre-feeding protocol (pre-FP), which encompassed the years 2002-2008, and post-feeding protocol (post-FP), which encompassed the years 2011-2014. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative data were collected. T test or Fisher's exact test was used for analysis. p < 0.05 was considered significant. Seventy-three neonates were in the pre-FP and 52 neonates were in the post-FP. There were no significant differences between the pre-FP and the post-FP in cardiac diagnosis (62 HLHS, 11 other vs. 39 HLHS, 13 other, respectively). Pre-FP underwent hybrid procedure later than the post-FP (9.1 ± 5.8 vs. 5.7 ± 3.4 days, respectively, p < 0.01) and achieved full enteral feeds earlier than the post-FP (3.2 + 2.9 vs. 7.8 + 3.9 days, respectively, p < 0.01). The incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis was higher in the pre-FP versus post-FP [11.0 % (8/65) vs. 5.8 % (3/49), respectively, p = 0.36]. Though not significant, the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis decreased by almost 50 % after initiating a feeding protocol in patients undergoing the hybrid procedure. This is consistent with previous studies showing beneficial results of a feeding protocol in this complex patient population.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app