We have located links that may give you full text access.
Focal dome osteotomy for correction of varus deformity at elbow in children.
JPMA. the Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association 2015 November
BACKGROUND: Cubitus varus is the most common complication of un-treated or mal-treated supracondylar fracture of humerus at elbow. Various osteotomies have been described to correct this deformity but each is associated with its own complications. In this study, focal dome osteotomy for correction of cubitus varus was performed to determine its functional and radiological outcome.
MATERIALS AND METHOD: In this study, 35 children with cubitus varus deformity were admitted from Jan 2009- Jan 2013. Clinical assessment was done before the procedure by measuring the carrying angle at elbow joint. Radiographic assessment of deformity was done by anteroposterior (AP) radiographs of the elbow by measuring the humeral-ulnar angle (HUA) and metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle (MDA). Through anterolateral approach, supracondylar region of humerus was exposed and focal dome osteotomy was done at the center of rotation of angulation (CORA). Final assessment was done clinically for carrying angle and radiologically for HUA and MDA at 8 weeks to evaluate the functional and radiological outcome as good or poor.
RESULTS: The mean age of 35 children at the time of surgery was (mean ± SD 8.03 ± 2.35) with range from 5 - 12 years, Male to female ratio was 1.50:1. The mean duration of injury was (170.26 ± 41.78) days. The functional outcome for carrying angle improved from 1.49 ± 5.95 to 14.46 ±1.44 with p value <0.05. Radiological outcome for humeral-ulnar and metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle improved from 27.71 ± 4.31 to 17.77 ± 1.23 and 103.66 ± 4.76 to 90.49 ± 1.96 with p value <0.05 respectively. The final Functional and Radiological outcome was good in 32 patients (91%) and poor in 3 patients (9%).
CONCLUSIONS: Focal dome osteotomy is safe and stable method of correction of cubitus varus which avoids prominence of lateral condyle and is cosmetically acceptable.
MATERIALS AND METHOD: In this study, 35 children with cubitus varus deformity were admitted from Jan 2009- Jan 2013. Clinical assessment was done before the procedure by measuring the carrying angle at elbow joint. Radiographic assessment of deformity was done by anteroposterior (AP) radiographs of the elbow by measuring the humeral-ulnar angle (HUA) and metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle (MDA). Through anterolateral approach, supracondylar region of humerus was exposed and focal dome osteotomy was done at the center of rotation of angulation (CORA). Final assessment was done clinically for carrying angle and radiologically for HUA and MDA at 8 weeks to evaluate the functional and radiological outcome as good or poor.
RESULTS: The mean age of 35 children at the time of surgery was (mean ± SD 8.03 ± 2.35) with range from 5 - 12 years, Male to female ratio was 1.50:1. The mean duration of injury was (170.26 ± 41.78) days. The functional outcome for carrying angle improved from 1.49 ± 5.95 to 14.46 ±1.44 with p value <0.05. Radiological outcome for humeral-ulnar and metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle improved from 27.71 ± 4.31 to 17.77 ± 1.23 and 103.66 ± 4.76 to 90.49 ± 1.96 with p value <0.05 respectively. The final Functional and Radiological outcome was good in 32 patients (91%) and poor in 3 patients (9%).
CONCLUSIONS: Focal dome osteotomy is safe and stable method of correction of cubitus varus which avoids prominence of lateral condyle and is cosmetically acceptable.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app