We have located links that may give you full text access.
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Evaluation of transfer parameters in patients admitted to our hospital with ST-elevation myocardial infarction].
OBJECTIVE: Acute coronary syndrom (ACS) is a common disease that causes severe morbidity and mortality. The most important aspect of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) as a subgroup of ACS treatment is the rapid reperfusion of arteries. Successful results depend not only on the experience of the center but also on the rapidity in which reperfusion is achieved. In our study, the transfer parameters were evaluated in patients who were admitted to our hospital with STEMI.
METHODS: Two hundred consecutive patients (160 males, 40 females) who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute STEMI between January 2011 and March 2013 were included in our study. Transfer parameters of symptom-to-reperfusion treatment, clinical characteristics, and laboratory parameters were recorded.
RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were admitted to our hospital with ambulances; 70 patients were admitted to centers without PCI capability, with a mean transfer time to our hospital of 73.9±12.5 min. Median pain-to-first medical contact time was 105 min (range: 5-600 min), and average first medical contact-to-balloon time was 115.5 min (range: 20-414 min). Total pain-to-balloon time in females was significantly higher than males (246 min [range: 70-840 min], 195 min [range: 45-684 min], respectively, p=0.032). Mean pain-to-balloon time was significantly lower in patients delivered to the hospital by ambulance than in patients admitted to emergency departments independently (185 min [range: 45-439 min], 248 min [range: 65-840 min], respectively, p=0.017).
CONCLUSION: In this study, our hospital door-to-balloon time was found compatible with the target specified in the European Society of Cardiology and American College of Cardiology STEMI guidelines; however, first medical contact-to-balloon time was found to be above that advised by the current guidelines.
METHODS: Two hundred consecutive patients (160 males, 40 females) who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute STEMI between January 2011 and March 2013 were included in our study. Transfer parameters of symptom-to-reperfusion treatment, clinical characteristics, and laboratory parameters were recorded.
RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were admitted to our hospital with ambulances; 70 patients were admitted to centers without PCI capability, with a mean transfer time to our hospital of 73.9±12.5 min. Median pain-to-first medical contact time was 105 min (range: 5-600 min), and average first medical contact-to-balloon time was 115.5 min (range: 20-414 min). Total pain-to-balloon time in females was significantly higher than males (246 min [range: 70-840 min], 195 min [range: 45-684 min], respectively, p=0.032). Mean pain-to-balloon time was significantly lower in patients delivered to the hospital by ambulance than in patients admitted to emergency departments independently (185 min [range: 45-439 min], 248 min [range: 65-840 min], respectively, p=0.017).
CONCLUSION: In this study, our hospital door-to-balloon time was found compatible with the target specified in the European Society of Cardiology and American College of Cardiology STEMI guidelines; however, first medical contact-to-balloon time was found to be above that advised by the current guidelines.
Full text links
Trending Papers
Acute and non-acute decompensation of liver cirrhosis (47/130).Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver 2024 March 2
Guide to Utilization of the Microbiology Laboratory for Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases: 2024 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Society for Microbiology (ASM).Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 March 6
Ten Influential Point-of-Care Ultrasound Papers: 2023 in Review.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 Februrary 20
Administration of methylene blue in septic shock: pros and cons.Critical Care : the Official Journal of the Critical Care Forum 2024 Februrary 17
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app