Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparison of ECG-based physiological markers for hypoxia in a preterm ovine model.

BACKGROUND: Current methods for assessing perinatal hypoxic conditions did not improve infant outcomes. Various waveform-based and interval-based ECG markers have been suggested, but not directly compared. We compare performance of ECG markers in a standardized ovine model for fetal hypoxia.

METHODS: Sixty-nine fetal sheep of 0.7 gestation had ECG recorded 4 h before, during, and 4 h after a 25-min period of umbilical cord occlusion (UCO), leading to severe hypoxia. Various ECG markers were calculated, among which were heart rate (HR), HR-corrected ventricular depolarization/repolarization interval (QTc), and ST-segment analysis (STAN) episodic and baseline rise markers, analogue to clinical STAN device alarms. Performance of interval- and waveform-based ECG markers was assessed by correlating predicted and actual hypoxic/normoxic state.

RESULTS: Of the markers studied, HR and QTc demonstrated high sensitivity (≥86%), specificity (≥96%), and positive predictive value (PPV) (≥86%) and detected hypoxia in ≥90% of fetuses at 4 min after UCO. In contrast, STAN episodic and baseline rise markers displayed low sensitivity (≤20%) and could not detect severe fetal hypoxia in 65 and 28% of the animals, respectively.

CONCLUSION: Interval-based HR and QTc markers could assess the presence of severe hypoxia. Waveform-based STAN episodic and baseline rise markers were ineffective as markers for hypoxia.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app