Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Suitability of a preserved human cadaver model for the simulation of facemask ventilation, direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: a laboratory investigation.

BACKGROUND: Using fresh or formalin-embalmed cadavers has not been generally accepted for the purposes of teaching airway management. We investigated whether cadavers 'preserved according Thiel's embalming method' (PATEM) are suitable for the simulation of facemask ventilation and tracheal intubation by direct laryngoscopy.

METHODS: This observational cluster sampling, controlled simulation study, included eight PATEM cadavers and eight manikins in two clusters. Twenty experienced anaesthetists were randomly assigned to execute 80 facemask ventilations and 80 tracheal intubations in both groups. The ease of facemask ventilation was the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoint was the composite outcomes of laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation.

RESULTS: The success rate at the first attempt at mask ventilation was 74% (59/80 attempts) on cadavers and 41% (33/80 attempts) on manikins (P<0.0001). Twenty one subjects received an oral airway in both groups and succeeded in facemask ventilation 20 times on cadavers and four times on manikins (P=0.004). Two-handed technique mask ventilation was required 24 times on manikins and once on cadavers (P=0.0016). In one attempt on a manikin the mask ventilation was impossible. Poor laryngeal view (Cormack-Lehane grade 3) occurred 14 times among cadavers (17.5%) and once in manikins (1.25%) (P=0.007), whereas difficulties in tracheal intubation were encountered 16 times in cadavers (20%) vs 17 times in manikins (21.25%) (P=0.84). In a subjective evaluation the participants preferred the cadaver model over the manikins (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS: PATEM cadavers were better suited for facemask ventilation and provided a more realistic environment for laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation than the studied manikins.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app