English Abstract
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Integration and analysis of associated data in surgical treatment of gastric cancer based on multicenter, high volume databases].

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the current diagnosis and treatment status of gastric cancer in the Chinese population based on three high volume databases.

METHODS: Clinical and pathological data of patients who underwent gastric cancer resection with complete follow-up information between January 2000 and December 2012 from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University and Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The overall survival rate was calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. The prognostic risk factors were analyzed by using Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS: A total of 8 338 cases were enrolled into the study, including 2 977 cases (35.7%) from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 3 043 cases (36.5%) from The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University and 2 318 cases (27.8%) from Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital. There were 5 852 male cases and 2 486 female cases with a ratio of 2.4 to 1.0. The age of patients was from 15 to 89 years old (median 59 years old). The ratio of early gastric cancer (T1NanyM0) was 11.5% (956/8 338). There were 2 226 gastric cancer cases (26.7%) originating from the fundus and cardiac region, 1 637 cases (19.6%) from the body, 3739 (44.9%) cases from the antrum, and 736 cases (8.8%) from the whole stomach. The median maximal tumor diameter was (4.5 ± 2.8) cm. Based on the Lauren classification, 3 448 cases (41.4%) were intestinal type and 4 890 cases (58.6%) diffuse type. A total of 1 975 cases (23.7%) and 6 363 cases (76.3%) underwent complete and subtotal gastrectomy respectively. The majority of patients (7 707 cases, 92.4%) underwent radical gastric resection, while 631 cases (7.6%) palliative resection. According to AJCC/UICC seventh edition of gastric cancer TNM staging system, 802 patients (9.6%) were stage I(A, 735 patients (8.8%) stage I(B, 695 patients (8.3%) stage II(A, 1 507 patients (18.1%) stage II(B, 1 247 patients (15.0%) stage III(A, 1 342 patients (16.1%) stage III(B, 1 583 patients (19.0%) stage III (C and 427 patients (5.1%) stage IIII(. The average number of retrieved lymph node was 21.0 ± 13.1, in which 5 761 patients (69.1%) had more than 15 retrieved lymph nodes. The overall 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year survival rates were 83.0%, 56.8%, 49.1% and 43.0% respectively. For patients receiving radical resection, the 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year survival rates were 84.9%, 59.5%, 51.7% and 45.3% respectively. The overall 5-year survival rates for different stages were as follows: stage I(A 93.8%, stage I(B 80.8%, stage II(A 70.8%, stage II(B 59.6%, stage III(A 44.4%, stage III(B 32.9%, stage III(C 18.9% and stage IIII( 10.2%. Cox regression model showed that age, tumor site, tumor size, Lauren type, T staging, N staging, M staging and number of retrieved lymph nodes were independent factors affecting the prognosis of gastric cancer patients (P=0.000).

CONCLUSION: Retrospective study on these domestic three high volume databases demonstrates the clinical and pathological characteristics of gastric cancer based on Chinese population, which is expected to stand as a ground of basic data for future clinical research.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app