COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparison of fetal and maternal heart rate measures using electrocardiographic and cardiotocographic methods.

PURPOSE: To determine the reliability at term of: (1) two methods of measuring fetal heart rate (HR), electrocardiographic (ECG, the 'gold standard') and cardiotocographic (CTG) and (2) two ECG methods of measuring maternal HR variability over relatively brief periods of time (s-min).

METHODS: During 20 min of rest (N=39) and during 2 min of auditory stimulation (mother's recorded voice, n=19), fetal HR data were collected using an ECG (Monica AN24) and a Hewlett-Packard Model 1351A CTG. Simultaneously, maternal HR data (n=37) were collected using the same ECG device (Monica AN24) and a second stand-alone cardiac monitor (Spacelab 514T cardiac monitor with a QRS detector).

RESULTS: During 20 min of maternal rest, correlations of individual fetal CTG with ECG measures of HR at each second were moderate to high (r=.57-.97) for 77% of fetuses. Correlations of HR averaged over fetuses and over each of the 20 min were high (r=.93-.97); fetal HR averaged over 20 min varied between devices from 0.0 to 0.8 bpm. During 2 min of maternal voice presentation, correlations of fetal HR over each second were moderate to high (r=.54-.99) for 95% of fetuses and high (all rs=.99) when averaged across fetuses in 30s or 2 min epochs. Average fetal HR between devices over the 2 min voice varied from 0.0 to 0.6 bpm. Correlations and/or % agreement between the two ECG methods of measuring maternal HR were high. Average maternal HR over 10 min showed 81% of pairs with a difference of ≤ 1 bpm; correlations for HR variability measures varied from r=.89 to .97.

CONCLUSIONS: Good reliability was demonstrated between individual spontaneous and auditory induced fetal CTG and ECG with high correlations when HR data were averaged over fetuses or in 30-120 s epochs. High reliability of maternal HR measures was obtained using two ECG devices.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app