We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Review
Evidence for Endovascular Simulation Training: A Systematic Review.
BACKGROUND: Simulation training in endovascular surgery provides opportunities for trainees to practice and learn from non-patient based experience. Several types of endovascular simulators are available commercially. Previous studies on endovascular simulation training can be categorized into trials in which only a simulator was used when measuring performance metrics or "trials within simulation"; patient specific procedure rehearsals; and randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) or translational studies.
OBJECTIVES: To examine whether endovascular simulation training can improve surgeon techniques and patient outcomes in real clinical settings.
METHODS: A literature review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. All searches were done via PubMed and Embase. Review articles, and papers that were not related to endovascular surgery and not within the scope of interest were excluded. References of review articles were further screened according to the exclusion criteria.
RESULTS: In total, 909 records were identified and 290 duplicates were removed. Thirty-one were included in the qualitative analysis. Twenty-three were trials within simulation and most of them found statistically significant improvements in procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and contrast volume. Five were patient specific procedure rehearsals and showed that simulation significantly affected the fluoroscopy angle and improved performance metrics. Three were RCTs and revealed mainly positive results on a Global Rating Scale and procedure specific rating scale.
CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary evidence shows that performance metrics within endovascular simulations improve with simulation training. Successful translation to in vivo situations is observed in patient specific procedure rehearsals and RCTs on real procedures. However, there is no level I evidence to show that predictive validity of simulation can definitively improve patient outcomes. Current literature supports the idea that there is a beneficial role of simulation in endovascular training. Future studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of simulation in endovascular surgical training and to see if simulation is superior to traditional training in the operating theatre.
OBJECTIVES: To examine whether endovascular simulation training can improve surgeon techniques and patient outcomes in real clinical settings.
METHODS: A literature review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. All searches were done via PubMed and Embase. Review articles, and papers that were not related to endovascular surgery and not within the scope of interest were excluded. References of review articles were further screened according to the exclusion criteria.
RESULTS: In total, 909 records were identified and 290 duplicates were removed. Thirty-one were included in the qualitative analysis. Twenty-three were trials within simulation and most of them found statistically significant improvements in procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and contrast volume. Five were patient specific procedure rehearsals and showed that simulation significantly affected the fluoroscopy angle and improved performance metrics. Three were RCTs and revealed mainly positive results on a Global Rating Scale and procedure specific rating scale.
CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary evidence shows that performance metrics within endovascular simulations improve with simulation training. Successful translation to in vivo situations is observed in patient specific procedure rehearsals and RCTs on real procedures. However, there is no level I evidence to show that predictive validity of simulation can definitively improve patient outcomes. Current literature supports the idea that there is a beneficial role of simulation in endovascular training. Future studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of simulation in endovascular surgical training and to see if simulation is superior to traditional training in the operating theatre.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app