English Abstract
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[10 YEARS' EXPERIENCE IN USING DIRECT URETEROINTESTINAL ANASTOMOSIS IN URINARY INTESTINAL DIVERSION AFTER RADICAL AND SIMPLE CYSTECTOMY].

Urologii︠a︡ 2015 July
147 patients who underwent urinary intestinal diversion from 2004 to 2014 were selected for the retrospective study. The authors carried out a comparative analysis of rates of complications that arise from the direct ureterointestinal anastomosis. The mean age of patients was 54.2 ± 3.0 (36-69) years. 60 (40.81%) patients of group 1 underwent Nesbit's direct ureterointestinal anastomosis, while in 87 (59.19%) patients of group 2 Wallace-1 and Wallace-2 anastomoses were performed. Average follow-up was 5.6 (2-10) years. Strictures of ureterointestinal anastomosis were detected in 2 (3.38%) patients of group 1 and in 1 (1.14%) patient of group 2. In all cases re-anastomosis was performed. The maximum postoperative concentration of serum creatinine in both groups was 231 mmol/l. According to radioisotope kidney scan, no differences in accumulative and excretory renal functions between two groups of patients were recorded. No kidney stone formation in both groups of patients during the follow-up period was observed. No ureteral reflux above grade 3 was noted. The clinical manifestation of reflux pyelonephritis was observed in 3.5% of the patients. Acute pyelonephritis was cured by antibacterial therapy.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app