We have located links that may give you full text access.
Determination of regional lymph node status using (18)F-FDG PET/CT parameters in oesophageal cancer patients: comparison of SUV, volumetric parameters and intratumoral heterogeneity.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate whether the standardized uptake values, volumetric parameters and intratumoral heterogeneity of fluorine-18-fludeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) uptake could predict regional lymph node (rLN) metastasis in oesophageal cancer.
METHODS: 51 patients with surgically resected oesophageal cancer were included in the present study. The (18)F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/CT findings and rLN metastasis were compared with the histopathological results. The intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity was represented by the heterogeneity factor (HF), which was determined for each patient. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to analyse the associations between the rLN metastasis and clinical findings, standardized uptake values, metabolic tumour volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and HF.
RESULTS: The rLN(+) group showed statistically significant higher values of MTV (median, 13.59 vs 6.6; p = 0.0085), TLG (median, 119.18 vs 35.96; p = 0.0072) and HF (median, 3.07 vs 2.384; p = 0.0002) than the rLN(-) group. Univariate analysis showed that maximum standardized uptake value, mean standardized uptake value, MTV, TLG and HF were significantly associated with pathologic rLN involvement. However, in multivariate analysis, the HF was a potent associated factor for the prediction of pathologic rLN metastasis in oesophageal cancer.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, (18)F-FDG PET/CT parameters such as maximum standardized uptake value, mean standardized uptake value, MTV, TLG and HF were useful for the prediction of pathologic rLN status in patients with oesophageal cancer. However, HF might be the most powerful predictor of rLN metastasis of patients with oesophageal cancer.
ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Assessment of intratumoral heterogeneity of (18)F-FDG PET/CT may be a useful adjunct for rLN staging of oesophageal cancer.
METHODS: 51 patients with surgically resected oesophageal cancer were included in the present study. The (18)F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/CT findings and rLN metastasis were compared with the histopathological results. The intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity was represented by the heterogeneity factor (HF), which was determined for each patient. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to analyse the associations between the rLN metastasis and clinical findings, standardized uptake values, metabolic tumour volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and HF.
RESULTS: The rLN(+) group showed statistically significant higher values of MTV (median, 13.59 vs 6.6; p = 0.0085), TLG (median, 119.18 vs 35.96; p = 0.0072) and HF (median, 3.07 vs 2.384; p = 0.0002) than the rLN(-) group. Univariate analysis showed that maximum standardized uptake value, mean standardized uptake value, MTV, TLG and HF were significantly associated with pathologic rLN involvement. However, in multivariate analysis, the HF was a potent associated factor for the prediction of pathologic rLN metastasis in oesophageal cancer.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, (18)F-FDG PET/CT parameters such as maximum standardized uptake value, mean standardized uptake value, MTV, TLG and HF were useful for the prediction of pathologic rLN status in patients with oesophageal cancer. However, HF might be the most powerful predictor of rLN metastasis of patients with oesophageal cancer.
ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Assessment of intratumoral heterogeneity of (18)F-FDG PET/CT may be a useful adjunct for rLN staging of oesophageal cancer.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app