Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparison of Two Different Ultrasound Systems for the Evaluation of Tissue Doppler Velocities in Fetuses.

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have reported variations of up to 30% between different ultrasound machines for tissue Doppler imaging (TDI), a problem that can significantly impact clinical diagnosis, patient management and research studies. The objective of this study was to assess repeatability and agreement between fetal myocardial peak velocities evaluated by TDI with two different ultrasound systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Systolic (S'), early (E') and late (A') diastolic myocardial peak velocities at mitral and tricuspid annuli as well as at the basal septum were evaluated by spectral TDI in 150 fetuses using two different ultrasound systems: Siemens Antares (Siemens Medical Systems, Malvern, Pa., USA) and Vivid Q (General Electric Healthcare, Horten, Norway). A method comparison study was performed, calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and agreement was assessed by Bland-Altman plots.

RESULTS: Annular peak velocities showed lower values when measured by Vivid Q compared to values measured by Siemens Antares. ICC ranged from 0.07 (septal S') to 0.33 (right A'), showing very poor repeatability for clinical application. Agreement between the two systems was also poor, with high coefficients of variation for all measurements.

CONCLUSIONS: Fetal annular peak velocities obtained with different ultrasound systems are not directly comparable. This is consistent with previous data in adults and warrants the need of system-specific reference values, suggesting that the same ultrasound machine should be used for longitudinal follow-up.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app